Callaham, Michael L.

Journal prestige publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals

Callaham, M. (2002) · JAMA

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 644

Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance

Baxt, W. G., Waeckerle, J. F., Berlin, J. A., & Callaham, M. L. (1998) · Annals of Emergency Medicine

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 141

Author Perception of Peer Review: Impact of Review Quality and Acceptance on Satisfaction

Weber, E. J., Katz, P. P., Waeckerle, J. F., & Callaham, M. L. (2002) · JAMA

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 140

Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts

Callaham, M. L. (1998) · JAMA

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 122

Masking Author Identity in Peer Review: What Factors Influence Masking Success?

Cho, M. K., Justice, A. C., Winker, M. A., Berlin, J. A., Waeckerle, J. F., Callaham, M. L., Rennie, D., & and the PEER Investigators (1998) · JAMA

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Cited by 104

Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews: Two Randomized Trials

Callaham, M. L., Knopp, R. K., & Gallagher, E. J. (2002) · JAMA

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 76