Ma, Jie
University of Oxford
9 papers on CoChatORCID 0000-0002-3900-1903
Most cited papers
- Verified
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
Christodoulou, E., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Steyerberg, E. W., Verbakel, J. Y., & Van Calster, B. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Cited by 2,119
- Verified
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
Collins, G. S., Dhiman, P., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Ma, J., Hooft, L., Reitsma, J. B., Logullo, P., Beam, A. L., Peng, L., Van Calster, B., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 852
- Verified
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
Collins, G. S., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Schlussel, M. M., Archer, L., Van Calster, B., Harrell, F. E., Martin, G. P., Moons, K. G. M., van Smeden, M., et al. (2024) · BMJ
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Cited by 798
- Verified
Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
Andaur Navarro, C. L., Damen, J. A. A., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., Moons, K. G. M., et al. (2021) · BMJ
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Cited by 415
- Verified
Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Speich, B., Bullock, G., Damen, J. A. A., Hooft, L., Kirtley, S., Riley, R. D., Van Calster, B., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Cited by 140
- Verified
Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
Andaur Navarro, C. L., Damen, J. A. A., van Smeden, M., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 121
- Verified
Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Speich, B., Bullock, G., Damen, J. A. A., Hooft, L., Kirtley, S., Riley, R. D., Van Calster, B., et al. (2022) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMachine Learning in Healthcare
Cited by 79
- Verified
Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review
Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Speich, B., Bullock, G., Damen, J. A. A., Hooft, L., Kirtley, S., Riley, R. D., Van Calster, B., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 41
- Verified
Clinical prediction models using machine learning in oncology: challenges and recommendations
Collins, G. S., Chester-Jones, M., Gerry, S., Ma, J., Matos, J., Sehjal, J., Tsegaye, B., & Dhiman, P. (2025) · BMJ Oncology
Machine Learning in HealthcareStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 27
Go further with a free account
Verify every reference, keep papers in a library, and ask questions across them.
Sign up - it is free