The ‘Ugly Duckling' Sign: Identification of the Common Characteristics of Nevi in an Individual as a Basis for Melanoma Screening
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PanDerm's analysis approach aligned well with established clinical practice, particularly the 'ugly duckling' concept of identifying atypical lesions through comparison with a patient's other lesions.
“We observed that PanDerm’s analysis approach aligned well with established clinical practice, particularly the ‘ugly duckling’ (UD) concept51 of identifying atypical lesions through comparison with a patient’s other lesions.”
From A Multimodal Vision Foundation Model for Clinical Dermatology (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Grob, J. J., & Bonerandi, J. J.
- Corresponding author
- Grob, J. J.
- ORCID
- Grob, J. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038729760
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Keywords
- nevi, melanoma screening, melanoma, pigmented skin lesions, lesion characteristics, melanoma detection
- MeSH terms
- Dermatology, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Mass Screening, Melanoma, Nevus, Skin Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
