Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonsurgical Repigmentation Therapies in Vitiligo: Meta-analysis of the Literature

Njoo, M. D., Spuls, P. I., Bos, J. D., Westerhof, W., Bossuyt, P. M. M.·1998·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of nonsurgical repigmentation therapies in localized and generalized vitiligo by means of a meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of bibliographic databases, a complementary manual literature search, and contacts with researchers and pharmaceutical firms. STUDY SELECTION: Predefined selection criteria were applied to both randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently assessed the articles for inclusion. When there was a disagreement, a third investigator was consulted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-three studies were found on therapies for localized vitiligo. Of these, 10 of 11 randomized controlled trials and 29 of 110 patient series were included. One hundred seventeen studies on therapies for generalized vitiligo were found. Of these, 10 of 22 randomized controlled trials and 46 of 231 patient series were included. Among randomized controlled trials on localized vitiligo, the pooled odds ratio vs placebo was significant for topical class 3 corticosteroids (14.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.45-83.72). In the patient series, topical class 3 and class 4 corticosteroids carried the highest mean success rates (56% [95% CI, 50%-62%] and 55% [95% CI, 49%-61%], respectively). Side effects were reported mostly with topical psoralen and intralesional and class 4 corticosteroids. In the randomized controlled trials on generalized vitiligo, the odds ratio vs placebo was significant for oral methoxsalen plus sunlight (23.37; 95% CI, 1.33-409.93), oral psoralen plus sunlight (19.87; 95% CI, 2.37-166.32), and oral trioxsalen plus sunlight (3.75; 95% CI, 1.24-11.29). In the series, the highest mean success rates were achieved with narrowband UV-B (63%; 95% CI, 50%-76%), broadband UV-B (57%; 95% CI, 29%-82%), and oral methoxsalen plus UV-A therapy (51%; 95% CI, 46%-56%). Oral methoxsalen plus UV-A was associated with the highest rates of side effects. No side effects were reported with UV-B therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Class 3 corticosteroids and UV-B therapy are the most effective and safest therapies for localized and for generalized vitiligo, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.134.12.1532

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Njoo, M. D., Spuls, P. I., Bos, J. D., Westerhof, W., & Bossuyt, P. M. M.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
134
Issue
12
Pages
1532-40
ISSN
0003-987X
OpenAlex
W2056418327
Cited by
258
References
5
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonsurgical Repigmentation Therapies in Vitiligo: Meta-analysis of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.134.12.1532
The paper
Njoo, M. D., Spuls, P. I., Bos, J. D., Westerhof, W., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (1998). Nonsurgical Repigmentation Therapies in Vitiligo: Meta-analysis of the Literature. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.134.12.1532

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.