The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature for studies reporting on recurrence rates of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) after different therapies. DESIGN: We reviewed all studies published in English, French, German, Dutch, Spanish, or Italian between 1970 and 1997 that prospectively examined recurrence rates for at least 50 patients with primary BCCs observed for at least 5 years after treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery, surgical excision, curettage and electrodesiccation, cryosurgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy with interferon or fluorouracil, or photodynamic therapy. SETTING: Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the reference center for dermatologic oncology and Mohs micrographic surgery in the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The recurrence rates after different therapies for BCCs, resulting in the development of guidelines for the treatment of these disorders. RESULTS: Of 298 studies found in several electronic databases, only 18 met the requirements and could be used for analysis. Tumors treated with Mohs micrographic surgery show the lowest recurrence rates after 5 years, followed in order by those treated with surgical excision, cryosurgery, and curettage and electrodesiccation. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates for different therapies could not be compared because of a lack of uniformity in the method of reporting, so evidence-based guidelines could not be developed. We surmise that Mohs micrographic surgery should be used mainly for larger, morphea-type BCCs located in danger zones. For smaller BCCs of the nodular and superficial types, surgical excision remains the first treatment of choice. Other treatment modalities can be used in patients in whom surgery is contraindicated. Immunotherapy and photodynamic therapy are still investigative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Phillips, A. N. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533 · Cited by 2,415
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371 · Cited by 646
Cited by
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, N. R., Colver, G. B., & Morton, C. A. (2008) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x · Cited by 960
Mosterd, K., Krekels, G. A., Nieman, F. H., Ostertag, J. U., Essers, B. A., Dirksen, C. D., Steijlen, P. M., Vermeulen, A., Neumann, H., & Kelleners-Smeets, N. W. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70260-2 · Cited by 466
Yarosh, D., Klein, J., O'Connor, A., Hawk, J., Rafal, E., & Wolf, P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04214-8 · Cited by 390
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Bath-Hextall, F. J., Perkins, W., Bong, J., & Williams, H. C. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003412.pub2 · Cited by 357
Rhodes, L. E., de Rie, M., Enström, Y., Groves, R., Morken, T., Goulden, V., Wong, G. A. E., Grob, J.-J., Varma, S., & Wolf, P. (2004) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.140.1.17 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Thissen, M. R. T. M., Neumann, M. H. A., & Schouten, L. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1177-83
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998263769
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.135.10.1177
- The paper
- Thissen, M. R. T. M., Neumann, M. H. A., & Schouten, L. J. (1999). A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.10.1177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.