The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Factors Associated With the Failure of a Venous Leg Ulcer to Heal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcers afflict a significant portion of the population. The most popular form of therapy for venous leg ulcers is a compression bandage (eg, Unna boot), a therapy that is frequently unsuccessful. OBJECTIVE: To describe risk factors associated with the failure of a wound to heal when treated with a limb-compression bandage for 24 weeks. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center outpatient specialty clinic at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty consecutive patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The magnitude of the effect of a given risk factor on the probability that a wound will heal within 24 weeks of care. RESULTS: Based on an assessment of leg wounds during initial office visits, we observed that the failure of a wound to heal within 24 weeks was significantly associated with larger wound area, measured in square centimeters (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.27), duration of the wound in months (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16), history of venous ligation or venous stripping (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.84-11.36), history of hip or knee replacement surgery (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.12-11.08), ankle brachial index of less than 0.80 (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.12-11.08), and the presence of fibrin on more than 50% of the wound surface (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.38-8.45). CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors are associated with the failure of a patient's venous leg ulcer to heal while using limb-compression therapy. It is prudent to consider these factors when referring a patient to a wound care subspecialists or for alternative therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis
Greenland, S. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.3.340 · Cited by 2,208
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
Cited by
Barwell, J. R., Davies, C. E., Deacon, J., Harvey, K., Minor, J., Sassano, A., Taylor, M., Usher, J., Wakely, C., Earnshaw, J. J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16353-8 · Cited by 630
Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration
Valencia, I. C., Falabella, A., Kirsner, R. S., & Eaglstein, W. H. (2001) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2001.111633 · Cited by 502
Venous leg ulcer: Incidence and prevalence in the elderly
Margolisa, B., Bilkerb, C., Santannab, C., & Baumgartenc, D. (2002) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.121739 · Cited by 458
Localio, A. R., Margolis, D. J., & Berlin, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.001 · Cited by 259
Self-citationKirsner, R. S., Marston, W. A., Snyder, R. J., Lee, T. D., Cargill, D. I., & Slade, H. B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60644-8 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Margolis, D. J., Berlin, J. A., & Strom, B. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 920-6
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161357321
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors Associated With the Failure of a Venous Leg Ulcer to Heal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.135.8.920
- The paper
- Margolis, D. J., Berlin, J. A., & Strom, B. L. (1999). Risk Factors Associated With the Failure of a Venous Leg Ulcer to Heal. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.8.920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.