Cited by 5Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementCancer and Skin LesionsMedicine and Dermatology Studies History

Dermoscopy of Pigmented Seborrheic Keratosis: A Morphological Study

Braun, Ralph Peter·2002·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

Objectives To describe morphological features of seborrheic keratosis as seen by dermoscopy and to investigate their prevalence. Design Prospective cohort study using macrophotography and dermoscopy for the documentation of seborrheic keratosis. Settings Seborrheic keratoses were prospectively collected in 2 sites: a private practice in Plantation, Fla (site 1), and the Department of Dermatology at the University Hospital Geneva in Switzerland (site 2). Patients A total of 203 pigmented seborrheic keratoses (from 192 patients) with complete documentation were collected (111 from site 1 and 93 from site 2). Interventions Screening for new morphological features of seborrheic keratosis and evaluation of all lesions for the prevalence of these criteria. Main Outcome Measures Identification of new morphological criteria and evaluation of frequency. Results A total of 15 morphological dermoscopic criteria were identified. Standard criteria such as milialike cysts and comedolike openings were found in a high number of cases (135 and 144, respectively). We found network and networklike structures to be present in 94 lesions (46%). Using standard diagnostic criteria for seborrheic keratosis, 30 lesions would not have been diagnosed as such. Conclusions The classic dermoscopic criteria for seborrheic keratosis (milialike cysts and comedolike openings) have a high prevalence but the use of additional dermoscopic criteria such as fissures, hairpin blood vessels, sharp demarcation, and moth-eaten borders improves the diagnostic accuracy. The proper identification of pigment network and networklike structures is important for the correct diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.138.12.1556

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma.

    “Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma9–20.”

    From Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braun, R. P.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Braun, Ralph Peter
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
138
Issue
12
Pages
1556
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W201078260
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Medicine and Dermatology Studies History
Keywords
seborrheic keratosis, dermoscopic criteria, pigmented skin lesions, pigment network, diagnostic accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review