Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Treatment of Psoriasis in the United Kingdom: A Population-Based Study

Gelfand, Joel M., Weinstein, Rachel, Porter, Steven B., Neimann, Andrea L., Berlin, Jesse A., Margolis, David J.·2005·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence and treatment of psoriasis in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study to determine prevalence and cohort study to determine treatment patterns. SETTING: Outpatient practices of general practitioners. PATIENTS: We included in the analysis all patients who were registered with a general practitioner in the General Practice Research Database from 1987 to 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence and treatment of psoriasis. RESULTS: We identified 114 521 patients with psoriasis of a total population of 7 533 475 patients, yielding a prevalence of 1.5%. The prevalence of psoriasis increases more rapidly in young female patients compared with young male patients and declines significantly in patients 70 years and older, regardless of sex. Overall, 91.8% of patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis received a prescription for psoriasis treatment on or after the date of their first diagnostic code of psoriasis in the General Practice Research Database. Most of the patients (55.2%) received only 1 or 2 prescriptions for psoriasis in the first year after psoriasis was documented in the General Practice Research Database. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of psoriasis in the General Practice Research Database population is similar to that of other epidemiologic studies of psoriasis performed in the United Kingdom, the United States, and other Western countries. Psoriasis carries a substantial burden given its high prevalence and its associated need for prescription therapy. Additional studies are necessary to determine why the prevalence of psoriasis increases more rapidly in female patients and to determine why the prevalence decreases in patients 70 years and older.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.141.12.1537

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Gelfand, J. M., Weinstein, R., Porter, S. B., Neimann, A. L., Berlin, J. A., & Margolis, D. J.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
141
Issue
12
Pages
1537-41
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093455167
Cited by
600
References
1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Treatment of Psoriasis in the United Kingdom: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.141.12.1537
The paper
Gelfand, J. M., Weinstein, R., Porter, S. B., Neimann, A. L., Berlin, J. A., & Margolis, D. J. (2005). Prevalence and Treatment of Psoriasis in the United Kingdom: A Population-Based Study. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.12.1537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.