Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 527

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002

Criscione, Vincent D., Weinstock, Martin A.·2007·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe incidence trends for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in the United States. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Data were obtained from 13 population-based cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute from 1973 through 2002. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4783 cases of CTCL were identified for the period 1973 through 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of CTCL. RESULTS: The overall annual age-adjusted incidence of CTCL was 6.4 per million persons. Annual incidence increased by 2.9 x 10(-6) per decade over the study period. Incidence was higher among blacks (9.0 x 10(-6)) than among whites (6.1 x 10(-6)) and was higher among men (8.7 x 10(-6)) than among women (4.6 x 10(-6)). The racial differences in incidence decreased with age, while the sex differences increased with age and decreased over time. Substantial geographic variation in incidence was found. Incidence was correlated with high physician density, high family income, high percentage of population with a bachelor's degree or higher, and high home values. Changes in International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) morphologic definitions have resulted in the redistribution of the cases of CTCL among specific subclassifications. CONCLUSIONS: The continued rise in incidence of CTCL is substantial, and the cause of this increase is unknown. The racial, ethnic, sex, and geographic differences in incidence may be of etiologic importance. Changes in ICD-O definitions have made it difficult to evaluate incidence trends for subclassifications of CTCL such as mycosis fungoides. In addition, these changes resulted in the creation of ambiguous histologic codes, which may have caused coding errors. These errors along with the lack of independent verification are limitations of our study. An epidemiological investigation using population-based data is important to better understand this disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.143.7.854

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 527

Metadata

Authors
Criscione, V. D., & Weinstock, M. A.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
143
Issue
7
Pages
854-9
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161055005
Cited by
527
References
8
FWCI
29.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.143.7.854
The paper
Criscione, V. D., & Weinstock, M. A. (2007). Incidence of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.143.7.854

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.