The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatitis C Virus and Lichen Planus: A Reciprocal Association Determined by a Meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and lichen planus (LP) by performing a meta-analysis of observational studies of the association. Data Sources Bibliographical searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases without any language limitations. Study Selection Studies were selected when the following criteria were met: the coexistence of a study group and a control group, the reliable and nonselective use of the reference standards for the diagnosis of LP and HCV, and the proportion of events (the prevalence of HCV in patients with LP or the prevalence of LP in patients with HCV). Data Extraction Three investigators independently assessed abstracts for relevant studies, and 2 investigators independently reviewed all eligible studies. Data Synthesis Sixty-three articles entailing 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For the primary outcome of prevalence of events, the meta-analysis showed that there existed an important association between HCV and LP. In the comparison of the prevalence of HCV exposure among patients with LP with that of control participants, the odds ratio (OR) was 5.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.3); in the prevalence of LP among patients with HCV compared with the prevalence among control participants, the OR was 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0-3.1). The subgroup analyses with geographical stratification did not show a significant association in studies from South Asia (P = .21), Africa (P = .15), and North America (P = .09), and the subgroup analyses from stratification by LP type also did not show a significant association in the isolated cutaneous type (P = .17). When strict criteria were applied, the results of sensitivity analysis remained robust. Conclusion Hepatitis C virus infection is associated with a statistically significant risk for development of LP, suggesting that the presence of either HCV or certain types of LP may be used as a predictive marker of the other in certain geographical regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-50 · Cited by 514
Cited by
Carrozzo, M., Porter, S., Mercadante, V., & Fedele, S. (2019) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12260 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Shengyuan, L., Songpo, Y., Wen, W., Wenjing, T., Haitao, Z., & Binyou, W.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1040-7
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976443805
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatitis C Virus and Lichen Planus: A Reciprocal Association Determined by a Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.200
- The paper
- Shengyuan, L., Songpo, Y., Wen, W., Wenjing, T., Haitao, Z., & Binyou, W. (2009). Hepatitis C Virus and Lichen Planus: A Reciprocal Association Determined by a Meta-analysis. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.