Cited by 156Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCleft Lip and Palate Research

Extracorporeal Septoplasty for the Markedly Deviated Septum

Gubisch, Wolfgang·2005·Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique of extracorporeal septal reconstruction to correct the markedly deviated nasal septum. DESIGN: Retrospective medical chart review of 2119 patients undergoing extracorporeal septoplasty from January 1, 1981, through July 31, 2004, by the author in a tertiary care facial plastic surgery center. The main outcomes measured included surgical complications, revision rate, and the surgeon's subjective determination of functional and aesthetic outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 2119 patients, 2 cohorts were available for review. From January 1, 1981, to July 31, 1987, the author performed the operation on 459 patients. Fifty-seven complications (12%) occurred, with irregular contour of the dorsum or saddling noted in 38 (8%). Twenty patients (4%) elected to have revision septoplasty. From January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1996, the author supervised residents performing extracorporeal septoplasty in 108 patients. Fourteen postoperative complications (13%) occurred, with dorsal irregularity noted in 12 (11%). Eight patients (7%) elected to have revision septoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal septal reconstruction is an important surgical option for the correction of the markedly deviated nasal septum. Fixation of the straightened and replanted septum at the nasal spine and dorsal septum border with the upper lateral cartilages is essential. Spreader grafts for stabilization of the internal nasal valve and dorsal onlay grafts to prevent dorsal irregularity are strongly encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archfaci.7.4.218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 156

Authors
Gubisch, W.
Affiliations
Marienhospital Stuttgart (DE)
Corresponding author
Gubisch, Wolfgang
Venue
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
218-226
ISSN
  • 1521-2491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3660
OpenAlex
W2117307624
Cited by
156
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
extracorporeal septoplasty, septal deviation, septal reconstruction, upper lateral cartilages, spreader grafts, internal nasal valve, dorsal onlay graft, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review