Cited by 229Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Altered Neural Reward Representations in Pathological Gamblers Revealed by Delay and Probability Discounting

Open access
Miedl, Stephan F.·2012·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: The neural basis of excessive delay discounting and reduced risk sensitivity of pathological gamblers with a particular focus on subjective neural reward representations has not been previously examined. OBJECTIVE: To examine how pathological gamblers represent subjective reward value at a neural level and how this is affected by gambling severity. DESIGN: Model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging study with patients and control subjects. SETTING: Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from the local community by advertisement and through self-help groups. A sample of 16 pathological gamblers (according to the DSM-IV definition) was matched by age, sex, smoking status, income, educational level, and handedness to 16 healthy controls. RESULTS: Pathological gamblers showed increased discounting of delayed rewards and a trend toward decreased discounting of probabilistic rewards compared with matched controls. At the neural level, a significant group × condition interaction indicated that reward representations in the gamblers were modulated in a condition-specific manner, such that they exhibited increased (delay discounting) and decreased (probability discounting) neural value correlations in the reward system. In addition, throughout the reward system, neuronal value signals for delayed rewards were negatively correlated with gambling severity. CONCLUSIONS: The results extend previous reports of a generally hypoactive reward system in pathological gamblers by showing that, even when subjective reward valuation is accounted for, gamblers still show altered reward representations. Furthermore, results point toward a gradual degradation of mesolimbic reward representations for delayed rewards during the course of pathological gambling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1552

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 229

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Engelmann JB, Brooks AM. Behavioral and neural effects of delays during inter- temporal choice are independent of probability. J Neurosci. 2009;29(19):6055- 6057.
  2. Pine A, Shiner T, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans. J Neurosci. 2010;30(26):8888-8896.

Authors
Miedl, S. F.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Miedl, Stephan F.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
177
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028636953
Cited by
229
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
22.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
gambling addiction, delay discounting, probability discounting, reward systems, mesolimbic system, gambling severity, delayed rewards, probabilistic reward
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Choice Behavior, Female, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Reaction Time, Reward, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review