Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures

R. R. MacGregor·1972·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Blood culture experience at a general hospital was reviewed for rate of contamination, and to establish criteria differentiating contamination from bacteremia. Only clinical data were used to decide whether or not positive cultures signified bacteremia. Laboratory correlations were then made: multiple positive cultures were found in 69% of bacteremic patients who were cultured more than once, while only 11% of contaminated cases had more than one positive culture. Similarly, 68% of pour-plate cultures were positive in bacteremia, vs 5.8% for contaminated cultures. Some organisms were found only in bacteremia, others only as contaminants. The number of positive cultures, results of simultaneous pour-plate cultures, and identification of the organism are all helpful facts in differentiating positive blood cultures which indicate bacteremia from those representing contamination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/archinte.130.1.84

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
MacGregor, R. R.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1972-07-01
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
84-87
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248016533
Cited by
232
References
0
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.130.1.84
The paper
MacGregor, R. R. (1972). Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.130.1.84

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.