The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures
Abstract
Blood culture experience at a general hospital was reviewed for rate of contamination, and to establish criteria differentiating contamination from bacteremia. Only clinical data were used to decide whether or not positive cultures signified bacteremia. Laboratory correlations were then made: multiple positive cultures were found in 69% of bacteremic patients who were cultured more than once, while only 11% of contaminated cases had more than one positive culture. Similarly, 68% of pour-plate cultures were positive in bacteremia, vs 5.8% for contaminated cultures. Some organisms were found only in bacteremia, others only as contaminants. The number of positive cultures, results of simultaneous pour-plate cultures, and identification of the organism are all helpful facts in differentiating positive blood cultures which indicate bacteremia from those representing contamination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Nolan, C. M., & Beaty, H. N. (1976) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(76)90715-4 · Cited by 314
Uslan, D. Z. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.8.834 · Cited by 274
Who Needs a Blood Culture? A Prospectively Derived and Validated Prediction Rule
Shapiro, N. I., Wolfe, R. E., Wright, S. B., Moore, R., & Bates, D. W. (2008) · The Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.001 · Cited by 268
Complications of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in the Care of Critically III Patients
Elliott, C. G., Zimmerman, G. A., & Clemmer, T. P. (1979) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.76.6.647 · Cited by 265
Predicting Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients: A Prospectively Validated Model
Bates, D. W., Cook, E. F., Goldman, L., & Lee, T. H. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-7-495 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- MacGregor, R. R.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1972-07-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-87
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248016533
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.130.1.84
- The paper
- MacGregor, R. R. (1972). Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.130.1.84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.