The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in The Netherlands. II. Antecedent procedures and use of prophylaxis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reported frequency with which endocarditis is ascribed to an antecedent dental or medical procedure varies from 3% to 62%. METHODS: We performed a nationwide prospective study of the epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands. During a 2-year period, all consecutively hospitalized patients suspected of having endocarditis were visited while still hospitalized for a review of the medical record and an in-person interview that focused on antecedent procedures and administered prophylaxis. All information was checked with pharmacists and dental and medical practitioners. RESULTS: Of 427 patients with late prosthetic or native valve endocarditis, 275 were eligible for antibiotic prophylaxis because of a previously known cardiac lesion (n = 197) or a prosthetic valve (n = 78). Of these 275 patients, 64 (23.3%) had undergone a procedure with an indication for prophylaxis within 180 days of onset; in 31 (11.3%) the procedures had been within 30 days of onset. Antibiotic prophylaxis had been administered to 17 (26.6%) of the 64 patients and to eight (25.8%) of the 31 patients. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that medical and dental procedures cause only a small fraction of endocarditis. The majority of patients develop the disease along other routes. For an incubation period of 180 days, full compliance with prophylaxis might have prevented endocarditis in 47 (17.1%) of 275 patients with late prosthetic or native valve endocarditis involving a previously known cardiac lesion who underwent a procedure with an indication for prophylaxis. For an incubation period of 30 days, prophylaxis might have prevented endocarditis in 23 (8.4%) of these 275 patients, or 5.3% of all patients with endocarditis (n = 427).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Durack, D. T., Lukes, A. S., Bright, D. K., & Service, D. E. (1994) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90143-0 · Cited by 2,572
Warnes, C. A., Williams, R. G., Bashore, T. M., Child, J. S., Connolly, H. M., Dearani, J. A., del Nido, P., Fasules, J. W., Graham, T. P., Hijazi, Z. M., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.190811 · Cited by 2,066
ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
Warnes, C. A., Williams, R. G., Bashore, T. M., Child, J. S., Connolly, H. M., Dearani, J. A., del Nido, P., Fasules, J. W., Graham, T. P., Hijazi, Z. M., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001 · Cited by 1,533
Prevention of infective endocarditis: Guidelines from the American Heart Association
Wilson, W., Taubert, K. A., Gewitz, M., Lockhart, P. B., Baddour, L. M., Levison, M., Bolger, A., Cabell, C. H., Takahashi, M., Baltimore, R. S., et al. (2008) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0346 · Cited by 484
Prevention of Infective Endocarditis
Durack, D. T. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199501053320107 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Meer, J. T. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1869-1873
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170638648
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in The Netherlands. II. Antecedent procedures and use of prophylaxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.152.9.1869
- The paper
- van der Meer, J. T. M. (1992). Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in The Netherlands. II. Antecedent procedures and use of prophylaxis. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.152.9.1869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.