Cited by 369Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Comparison of Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, and Multiple Chemical Sensitivities

Buchwald, Dedra·1994·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS) are conditions associated with fatigue and a variety of other symptoms that appear to share many clinical and demographic features. Our objectives were to describe the similarities and differences among patients with CFS, FM, and MCS. Additional objectives were to determine how frequently patients with MCS and FM met the criteria for CFS and if they differed in their health locus of control. Methods Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures were prospectively collected in 90 patients, 30 each with CFS, FM, and MCS. Patients were recruited from a university-based referral clinic devoted to the evaluation and treatment of chronic fatigue and three private practices. Variables included demographic features, symptoms characteristic of each condition, psychological complaints, a measure of health locus of control, and information on health care use. Results Overall, the three patient groups were remarkably similar in demographic characteristics and the presence of specific symptoms. Patients with CFS and FM frequently reported symptoms compatible with MCS. Likewise, 70% of patients with FM and 30% of those with MCS met the criteria for CFS. Health care use was substantial among patients with CFS, FM, and MCS, with an average of 22.1, 39.7, and 23.3 visits, respectively, to a medical provider during the prior year. Health locus of control did not differ among the three pop…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420180053007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 369

Authors
Buchwald, D.
Affiliations
Harborview Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Buchwald, Dedra
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1994-09-26
Volume
154
Issue
18
Pages
2049
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994189937
Cited by
369
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ai026788-03, 5r01ag008240-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG08240)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI26788)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, multiple chemical sensitivity, health locus of control, symptom overlap, health care utilization, patient demographics, psychological complaints, chronic fatigue
MeSH terms
Adult, Drug Hypersensitivity, Environmental Exposure, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review