The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
A Noninvasive Strategy for the Treatment of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism has historically presented a formidable diagnostic problem because of the nonspecificity of the clinical findings associated with this disorder and the diagnostic uncertainties and challenges presented by both ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and pulmonary angiography. We have reported previously that serial noninvasive leg testing provides a practical noninvasive alternative to pulmonary angiography in patients with non-high probability (nondiagnostic) lung scans and adequate cardiorespiratory reserve. We have reevaluated this observation prospectively to (1) confirm or refute our original observation in an independent cohort and (2) to increase the numbers sufficiently to provide narrow confidence limits for the observed outcomes. METHODS: A prospective comparative study in 1564 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism who underwent ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and objective testing for proximal-vein thrombosis. RESULTS: On long-term follow-up of 627 patients with the following characteristics: (1) abnormal, nondiagnostic lung scans, (2) not taking anticoagulant therapy, and (3) serial noninvasive test results negative for proximal-vein thrombosis, only 12 patients (1.9%; 95% confidence limits, 0.8% to 3.0%) had venous thromboembolism. By comparison, venous thromboembolism on follow-up occurred in four (0.7%) of 586 patients (95% confidence limits, 0.02% to 1.3%) with normal lung scans in whom anticoagulant therapy was withheld and in eight (5.5%) of 145 patients (95% confidence limits, 1.8% to 9.2%) with high probability lung scans who received anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the clinician has a practical noninvasive strategy in patients with adequate cardiorespiratory reserve and nondiagnostic lung scans that (1) avoids pulmonary angiography, (2) identifies patients with proximal-vein thrombosis who require treatment, and (3) avoids the need for treatment and further investigation in the majority of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antiphospholipid Antibodies and venous thromboembolism
Ginsberg, J., Wells, P., Brill-Edwards, P., Donovan, D., Moffatt, K., Johnston, M., Stevens, P., & Hirsh, J. (1995) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v86.10.3685.bloodjournal86103685 · Cited by 365
Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism
Righini, M., Goehring, C., Bounameaux, H., & Perrier, A. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00493-9 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Hull, R. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1994-02-14
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-289
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992155469
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Noninvasive Strategy for the Treatment of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.154.3.289
- The paper
- Hull, R. D. (1994). A Noninvasive Strategy for the Treatment of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.154.3.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.