The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
The Epidemiology of Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in the Elderly
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are no studies that define the basic epidemiology of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the elderly. This project was undertaken to provide that information. METHODS: We obtained all Medicare claims during the period 1986 through 1989 from a random 5% sample of US Medicare enrollees. By selecting codes used for diagnoses and treatment, we identified 7174 cases of PE and 8923 cases of DVT. These cohorts were analyzed to provide incidence by age, race, sex, and geographic location; frequency of invasive treatment; frequency of PE after treatment for DVT; frequency of recurrence of PE; and survival after diagnosis. RESULTS: Annual incidence rates per 1000 at age 65 to 69 years for PE and DVT were 1.3 and 1.8, respectively. Both rates increased steadily with age to 2.8 and 3.1 by age 85 to 89 years. For PE, women had lower rates than men (adjusted relative risk, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 0.90), and blacks had higher rates than whites (adjusted relative risk, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.36). For DVT, the associations with gender and race were weaker and in the opposite direction. Pulmonary embolectomy was done in 0.2% of cases of PE; interruption of the vena cava was done in 4.4% of cases of PE and in 2% of cases of DVT. Thrombectomy was done in 0.3% of all cases. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 1.7% of patients with DVT within 1 year of hospital discharge for initial treatment. The 1-year recurrence rate for PE was 8.0%. In-hospital mortality associated with PE and DVT was 21% and 3%, respectively. One-year mortality was 39% and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary embolism and DVT are common problems in the elderly. Both increase with age, but the effects of race and sex are small. Current treatment patterns appear to be effective in preventing both PE after DVT and recurrence of PE. Both are associated with substantial 1-year mortality, suggesting the need to understand the role of associated conditions as well as the indications for prophylaxis and the methods of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kyrle, P. A., & Eichinger, S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71880-8 · Cited by 616
Heit, J. A., Petterson, T. M., Farmer, S. A., Bailey, K. R., & Melton, L. J. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v108.11.1488.1488 · Cited by 319
Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism
Righini, M., Goehring, C., Bounameaux, H., & Perrier, A. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00493-9 · Cited by 313
Risk factors and clinical impact of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism
Gangireddy, C., Rectenwald, J. R., Upchurch, G. R., Wakefield, T. W., Khuri, S., Henderson, W. G., & Henke, P. K. (2007) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.034 · Cited by 295
Agarwal, S., Clark, D., Sud, K., Jaber, W. A., Cho, L., & Menon, V. (2015) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.048 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Kniffin, W. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1994-04-25
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 861-861
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089435005
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epidemiology of Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in the Elderly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.154.8.861
- The paper
- Kniffin, W. D. (1994). The Epidemiology of Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in the Elderly. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.154.8.861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.