Cited by 434Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Attitude and Self-reported Practice Regarding Prognostication in a National Sample of Internists

Open access
Christakis, Nicholas A., Iwashyna, Theodore J.·1998·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Since prognostication appears increasingly important in clinical practice, especially in end-of-life care, we examined physicians' experiences and attitudes regarding it. Methods We mailed a survey to a national sample of 1311 internists, yielding 697 responses that were analyzed with multivariate models and other means. Findings were supplemented by qualitative comments from 162 physicians and by interviews with 20. Results On an annual basis, the typical internist addressed the question "How long do I have to live?" 10 times, withdrew or withheld life support 5 times, and referred 5 patients to hospice. Nevertheless, physicians disdain prognostication: 60.4% find it "stressful" to make predictions; 58.7% find it "difficult"; 43.7% wait to be asked by a patient before offering predictions; 80.2% believe patients expect too much certainty; 50.2% believe that if they were to make an error, patients might lose confidence; 89.9% believe they should avoid being too specific; and 56.8% report inadequate training in prognostication. With respect to the key concept of "terminal" illness, physicians on average believe that such patients should have 13.5+/-11.8 weeks to live, but responses varied substantially from 1 to 75 weeks. Conclusions Physicians (1) commonly encounter situations that require prognostication, (2) feel poorly prepared for prognostication, (3) find it stressful and difficult to make predictions, (4) believe that patients expect too much certainty and mi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.158.21.2389

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 434

Authors
Christakis, N. A., & Iwashyna, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1998-11-23
Volume
158
Issue
21
Pages
2389
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099154190
Cited by
434
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • JAMA Internal Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
outcome prediction, physician attitudes, internists, end-of-life care, terminal illness, life expectancy prediction, patient expectations, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, hospice referral, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Death, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Interviews as Topic, Life Support Care, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Stress, Psychological, Terminal Care, Time Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Resuscitation Orders, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review