The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus Spondylitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis of the vertebral column is rapidly increasing and few studies dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of this severe disease are available. METHODS: Based on a nationwide registration, the clinical and bacteriological data were reviewed from 133 cases with a positive blood culture for S aureus and symptoms of vertebral osteomyelitis in Denmark for the period 1980 to 1990. RESULTS: The 133 cases of vertebral S aureus osteomyelitis reviewed were mainly community-acquired infections (82%) in older patients (median age, 65 years) and often occurred with underlying diseases. Both symptoms and laboratory values were relatively unspecific. Bone scan methods proved to be more optimal for diagnosis of vertebral S aureus osteomyelitis in the early stages compared with conventional radiography that proved a lack of consistency in the formative stages. The infection was mostly (70%) localized in the lower part of the column. The recurrence rate and rate of therapeutic failure depended on the duration and dosage of penicillinase-stable penicillins, respectively. Patients treated with fusidic acid in addition to penicillinase-stable penicillins had a significantly lower recurrence rate. Based on these findings, we recommend treatment with penicillinase-stable penicillins and fusidic acid for a total of 8 weeks, with a daily dosage of penicillinase-stable penicillins higher than 4 g. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of vertebral S aureus osteomyelitis based on clinical findings is difficult to ascertain. Bone scans are necessary because radiographic methods do not detect disease as early. Treatment with penicillinase-stable penicillins, at least 4 g/d for at least 8 weeks, is recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Clinical Identifiers of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Fowler, V. G., Olsen, M. K., Corey, G. R., Woods, C. W., Cabell, C. H., Reller, L. B., Cheng, A. C., Dudley, T., & Oddone, E. Z. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.17.2066 · Cited by 652
Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics
Mylona, E., Samarkos, M., Kakalou, E., Fanourgiakis, P., & Skoutelis, A. (2009) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.03.002 · Cited by 658
Robertson, F. C., Lepard, J. R., Mekary, R. A., Davis, M. C., Yunusa, I., Gormley, W. B., Baticulon, R. E., Mahmud, M. R., Misra, B. K., Rattani, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2017.10.jns17359 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, A. G., Espersen, F., Skinhøj, P., & Frimodt-Møller, N.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-03-09
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011786131
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus Spondylitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.158.5.509
- The paper
- Jensen, A. G., Espersen, F., Skinhøj, P., & Frimodt-Møller, N. (1998). Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus Spondylitis. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.5.509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.