The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physician, Nurse, and Social Worker Collaboration in Primary Care for Chronically Ill Seniors
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of an interdisciplinary, collaborative practice intervention involving a primary care physician, a nurse, and a social worker for community-dwelling seniors with chronic illnesses. METHODS: A concurrent, controlled cohort study of 543 patients in 18 private office practices of primary care physicians was conducted. The intervention group received care from their primary care physician working with a registered nurse and a social worker, while the control group received care as usual from their primary care physician. The outcome measures included changes in number of hospital admissions, readmissions, office visits, emergency department visits, skilled nursing facility admissions, home care visits, and changes in patient self-rated physical, emotional, and social functioning. RESULTS: From 1992 (baseline year) to 1993, the two groups did not differ in service use or in self-reported health status. From 1993 to 1994, the hospitalization rate of the control group increased from 0.34 to 0.52, while the rate in the intervention group stayed at baseline (P= .03). The proportion of intervention patients with readmissions decreased from 6% to 4%, while the rate in the control group increased from 4% to 9% (P=.03). In the intervention group, mean office visits to all physicians fell by 1.5 visits compared with a 0.5-visit increase for the control group (P=.003). The patients in the intervention group reported an increase in social activities compared with the control group's decrease (P=.04). With fewer hospital admissions, average per-patient savings for 1994 were estimated at $90, inclusive of the intervention's cost but exclusive of savings from fewer office visits. CONCLUSIONS: This model of primary care collaborative practice shows potential for reducing utilization and maintaining health status for seniors with chronic illnesses. Future work should explore the specific benefit accruing from physician involvement in the collaborative practice team.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Longitudinal Data Analysis for Discrete and Continuous Outcomes
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K.-Y. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531248 · Cited by 7,764
Sheikh (1986) · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_09 · Cited by 7,236
Dunteman, G. (1989) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985475 · Cited by 2,658
Rich, M. W., Beckham, V., Wittenberg, C., Leven, C. L., Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511023331806 · Cited by 2,328
Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J. E. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · Cited by 2,043
Naylor, M. D., Brooten, D., Campbell, R., Jacobsen, B. S., Mezey, M. D., Pauly, M. V., & Schwartz, J. S. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.7.613 · Cited by 1,831
A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction
DeBusk, R. F., Miller, N. H., Superko, H. R., Dennis, C. A., Thomas, R. J., Lew, H. T., Berger, W. E., Heller, R. S., Rompf, J., Gee, D., et al. (1994) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-120-9-199405010-00001 · Cited by 745
Aubert, R. E., Herman, W. H., Waters, J., Moore, W., Sutton, D., Peterson, B. L., Bailey, C. M., & Koplan, J. P. (1998) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-8-199810150-00004 · Cited by 560
Stuck, A. E., Aronow, H. U., Steiner, A., Alessi, C. A., Büla, C. J., Gold, M. N., Yuhas, K. E., Nisenbaum, R., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Beck, J. C. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511023331805 · Cited by 469
Cited by
Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6 · Cited by 780
Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care?
Ostbye, T. (2005) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.310 · Cited by 698
The Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Systematic Review
Jackson, G. L., Powers, B. J., Chatterjee, R., Prvu Bettger, J., Kemper, A. R., Hasselblad, V., Dolor, R. J., Irvine, R. J., Heidenfelder, B. L., Kendrick, A. S., et al. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579 · Cited by 699
Retooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5066 · Cited by 688
What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review
Poitras, M.-E., Maltais, M.-E., Bestard-Denommé, L., Stewart, M., & Fortin, M. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3213-8 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Sommers, L. S., Marton, K. I., Barbaccia, J. C., & Randolph, J.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-06-26
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1825
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011580808
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician, Nurse, and Social Worker Collaboration in Primary Care for Chronically Ill Seniors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.160.12.1825
- The paper
- Sommers, L. S., Marton, K. I., Barbaccia, J. C., & Randolph, J. (2000). Physician, Nurse, and Social Worker Collaboration in Primary Care for Chronically Ill Seniors. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.12.1825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.