The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discrepancies in the Use of Medications: Their Extent and Predictors in an Outpatient Practice
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Misuse of medications is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the frequency of, and factors associated with, discrepancies between what doctors prescribe and what patients take in actual practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients' medication bottles and their reported use of medications were compared with physicians' records of outpatients seen between November 1997 and February 1998 in a private practice affiliated with an academic medical center in Boston, Mass. Three hundred twelve patients from the practices of 5 cardiologists and 2 internists who were returning for their routine follow-up visits were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The presence of discrepancies based on comparing medication bottles with medical records. RESULTS: Discrepancies were present in 239 patients (76%). The 545 discrepancies in these patients were the result of patients taking medications that were not recorded (n = 278 [51%]); patients not taking a recorded medication (n = 158 [29%]); and differences in dosage (n = 109 [20%]). Overall, discrepancies were randomly distributed among different drugs and discrepancy types with no discernible pattern. On multivariate analysis, patient age and number of recorded medications were the 2 most significant predictors of medication discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies among recorded and reported medications were common and involved all classes of medications, including cardiac and prescription drugs. Older age and polypharmacy were the most significant correlates of discrepancy. The pervasiveness of discrepancies can have significant health care implications, and action is urgently needed to address their causes. Such action would likely have a positive impact on patient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates, D. W. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033 · Cited by 2,127
Cited by
Polypharmacy in the elderly: A literature review
Fulton, M. M., & Riley Allen, E. (2005) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1041-2972.2005.0020.x · Cited by 540
Gleason, K. M., McDaniel, M. R., Feinglass, J., Baker, D. W., Lindquist, L., Liss, D., & Noskin, G. A. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1256-6 · Cited by 406
Chesney, M. (2003) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/108729103321619773 · Cited by 373
Schlenk, E. A., Dunbar-Jacob, J., & Engberg, S. (2004) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/0098-9134-20040701-08 · Cited by 95
A Pharmacist and Health Promoter Team to Improve Medication Adherence Among Latinos with Diabetes
Gerber, B. S., Cano, A. I., Caceres, M. L., Smith, D. E., Wilken, L. A., Michaud, J. B., Ruggiero, L. A., & Sharp, L. K. (2010) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1m389 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bedell, S. E., Jabbour, S., Goldberg, R., Glaser, H., Gobble, S., Young-Xu, Y., Graboys, T. B., & Ravid, S.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-07-24
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2129
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080981268
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrepancies in the Use of Medications: Their Extent and Predictors in an Outpatient Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.160.14.2129
- The paper
- Bedell, S. E., Jabbour, S., Goldberg, R., Glaser, H., Gobble, S., Young-Xu, Y., Graboys, T. B., & Ravid, S. (2000). Discrepancies in the Use of Medications: Their Extent and Predictors in an Outpatient Practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.14.2129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.