Cited by 198Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Who Reports Receiving Advice to Lose Weight?: Results From a Multistate Survey

Sciamanna, Christopher N., Tate, Deborah F., Lang, Wei, Wing, Rena R.·2000·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Overweight and obesity are increasingly prevalent in the United States. The prevalence of health care provider advice to lose weight is not clear. Methods We examined the percentage of individuals who reported being advised to lose weight by a health care practitioner in the past year by population subgroup. Participants were individuals in the 10 states participating in the 1996 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which assessed advice to lose weight, hypertension awareness, and cholesterol awareness. Results The prevalence of reporting advice to lose weight was most strongly associated with body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and weight-related comorbidities. In individuals with a BMI of 25 to 27, only 5.6% of those with no comorbidities and 13.6% of those with comorbidities received advice. These rates were increased to 32.4% and 47.3%, respectively, in those with a BMI greater than 30. Middle-aged individuals, those with more education, and those living in the northeast were also more likely to receive advice. Receiving advice to maintain weight was reported by only 2. 5% of respondents. Receiving advice to lose weight was strongly associated with trying to lose weight, especially in those with a BMI of 25 to 27, where 77.5% who received advice reported trying to lose weight vs 33.4% of those who did not receive advice. Conclusions Advice to lose weight is uncommon and is given primarily to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.160.15.2334

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 198

Authors
Sciamanna, C. N., Tate, D. F., Lang, W., & Wing, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Miriam Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2000-08-14
Volume
160
Issue
15
Pages
2334
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032672680
Cited by
198
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
19.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
weight loss advice, health professional counseling, obesity, overweight, body mass index, weight-related comorbidities, weight maintenance, weight loss behavior, hypertension awareness, cholesterol awareness, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, United States, Weight Loss, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review