The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalist and Subspecialist Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations for Elderly and Other High-Risk Patients: A Nationwide Survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates remain too low. This survey assessed generalist and subspecialist physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations for high-risk patients. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 6000 physicians randomly selected from a national database. RESULTS: After 3 mailings, 1874 physicians (32%) of the 5858 eligible responded. Although most physicians thought that it was very important for their high-risk patients be current on influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, only 86% and 75% of generalists and subspecialists, respectively, very strongly recommended influenza vaccinations to their elderly patients and only 81% and 64%, respectively, very strongly recommended pneumococcal vaccinations to their elderly patients (P<.001 for both). After multivariate logistic regression, factors significantly associated with strongly recommending vaccinations to elderly patients in the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination models included female sex of provider, the provider having received an influenza vaccination, the provider's beliefs about vaccine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, a patient's risk for illness, and ease of targeting patients. In addition, generalists were more likely than subspecialists to strongly recommend pneumococcal vaccinations to their patients. Patient reminders, special clinics, and standing orders were each used by fewer than 30% of respondents, although generalists were more likely than subspecialists to use such strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Nontrivial proportions of generalist and subspecialist physicians fail to strongly recommend influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to their elderly and high-risk patients. Other effective strategies for promoting vaccine delivery are also used relatively infrequently. These findings suggest areas for improvement if vaccination rates are to reach national goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benefits of influenza vaccination for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk senior citizens.
Nichol, K. L., Wuorenma, J., & von Sternberg, T. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1769 · Cited by 484
Cited by
Nichol, K. L., Nordin, J., Mullooly, J., Lask, R., Fillbrandt, K., & Iwane, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025028 · Cited by 752
Self-citationDeterminants of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in elderly people: a systematic review
Kohlhammer, Y., Schnoor, M., Schwartz, M., Raspe, H., & Schäfer, T. (2007) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.011 · Cited by 254
Smetana, G. W. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.1.10 · Cited by 131
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community
Thomas, R. E., Russell, M., & Lorenzetti, D. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005188.pub2 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Nichol, K. L., & Zimmerman, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-12-10
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2702
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989186377
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalist and Subspecialist Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations for Elderly and Other High-Risk Patients: A Nationwide Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.161.22.2702
- The paper
- Nichol, K. L., & Zimmerman, R. (2001). Generalist and Subspecialist Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations for Elderly and Other High-Risk Patients: A Nationwide Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.22.2702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.