The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic Surgery<subtitle>A Meta-analysis of 4 Randomized Double-blind Studies</subtitle>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgery remains a condition at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Fondaparinux, the first of a new class of synthetic selective factor Xa inhibitors, may further reduce this risk compared with currently available thromboprophylactic treatments. METHODS: A meta-analysis of 4 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials in patients undergoing elective hip replacement, elective major knee surgery, and surgery for hip fracture (N = 7344) was performed to determine whether a subcutaneous 2.5-mg, once-daily regimen of fondaparinux sodium starting 6 hours after surgery was more effective and as safe as approved enoxaparin regimens in preventing VTE. The primary efficacy outcome was VTE up to day 11, defined as deep vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography or documented symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: Fondaparinux significantly reduced the incidence of VTE by day 11 (182 [6.8%] of 2682 patients) compared with enoxaparin (371 [13.7%] of 2703 patients), with a common odds reduction of 55.2% (95% confidence interval, 45.8% to 63.1%; P<.001); this beneficial effect was consistent across all types of surgery and all subgroups. Although major bleeding occurred more frequently in the fondaparinux-treated group (P =.008), the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (leading to death or reoperation or occurring in a critical organ) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, 2.5 mg of fondaparinux sodium once daily, starting 6 hours postoperatively, showed a major benefit over enoxaparin, achieving an overall risk reduction of VTE greater than 50% without increasing the risk of clinically relevant bleeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy
Douketis, J. D., Spyropoulos, A. C., Spencer, F. A., Mayr, M., Jaffer, A. K., Eckman, M. H., Dunn, A. S., & Kunz, R. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2298 · Cited by 1,641
Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Hip Arthroplasty
Eriksson, B. I., Borris, L. C., Friedman, R. J., Haas, S., Huisman, M. V., Kakkar, A. K., Bandel, T. J., Beckmann, H., Muehlhofer, E., Misselwitz, F., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0800374 · Cited by 1,433
Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Lassen, M. R., Ageno, W., Borris, L. C., Lieberman, J. R., Rosencher, N., Bandel, T. J., Misselwitz, F., & Turpie, A. G. G. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa076016 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationComparison of Fondaparinux and Enoxaparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055443 · Cited by 1,228
Lassen, M. R., Raskob, G. E., Gallus, A., Pineo, G., Chen, D., & Hornick, P. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62125-5 · Cited by 777
Metadata
- Authors
- Turpie, A. G. G.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-09-09
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1833
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098108939
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic Surgery<subtitle>A Meta-analysis of 4 Randomized Double-blind Studies</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.162.16.1833
- The paper
- Turpie, A. G. G. (2002). Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic Surgery<subtitle>A Meta-analysis of 4 Randomized Double-blind Studies</subtitle>. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.16.1833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.