The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Incidence, Risk, and Prognosis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Initial empirical antimicrobial treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is based on expected microbial patterns. We determined the incidence of, prognosis of, and risk factors for CAP due to gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CAP hospitalized in our 1000-bed tertiary care university teaching hospital were studied prospectively. Independent risk factors for CAP due to GNB and for death were identified by means of stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From January 1, 1997, until December 31, 1998, 559 hospitalized patients with CAP were included. Sixty patients (11%) had CAP due to GNB, including P aeruginosa in 39 (65%). Probable aspiration (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.2; P =.04), previous hospital admission (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1; P<.001), previous antimicrobial treatment (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.01-3.7; P =.049), and the presence of pulmonary comorbidity (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5; P =.02) were independent predictors of GNB. In a subgroup analysis of P aeruginosa pneumonia, pulmonary comorbidity (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.2-15.3; P<.001) and previous hospital admission (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8-8.3; P =.02) were predictive. Infection with GNB was independently associated with death (relative risk, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-7.4; P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, in every tenth patient with CAP, an etiology due to GNB has to be considered. Patients with probable aspiration, previous hospitalization or antimicrobial treatment, and pulmonary comorbidity are especially prone to GNB. These pathogens are also an independent risk factor for death in patients with CAP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metlay, J. P., Waterer, G. W., Long, A. C., Anzueto, A., Brozek, J., Crothers, K., Cooley, L. A., Dean, N. C., Fine, M. J., Flanders, S. A., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1581st · Cited by 3,657
Pseudomonas aeruginosa : new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses
Gellatly, S. L., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2013) · Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1111/2049-632x.12033 · Cited by 1,295
Paterson, D. L. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/504476 · Cited by 344
Rottier, W. C., Bamberg, Y. R. P., Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., van der Linden, P. D., Ammerlaan, H. S. M., & Bonten, M. J. M. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ121 · Cited by 61
Rottier, W. C., van Werkhoven, C. H., Bamberg, Y. R. P., Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., van de Garde, E. M., van Hees, B. C., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Kuck, E. M., van der Linden, P. D., Prins, J. M., et al. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.023 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Arancibia, F., Bauer, T. T., Ewig, S., Mensa, J., Gonzalez, J., Niederman, M. S., & Torres, A.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-09-09
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1849
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015372428
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Incidence, Risk, and Prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.162.16.1849
- The paper
- Arancibia, F., Bauer, T. T., Ewig, S., Mensa, J., Gonzalez, J., Niederman, M. S., & Torres, A. (2002). Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Incidence, Risk, and Prognosis. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.16.1849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.