The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Prescribing Practices: Risk of Lactic Acidosis With Metformin Therapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of lactic acidosis during metformin therapy is linked to specific and well-documented conditions that constitute contraindications or precautions to use of the agent. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of metformin use to determine whether prescribing practices are in accord with published contraindications and precautions. METHODS: All patients admitted to the hospital during a 6-month period who received at least 1 dose of metformin were identified through hospital pharmacy records. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were then evaluated to determine whether metformin was prescribed to patients possessing any of the risk factors associated with development of lactic acidosis. RESULTS: We identified 263 hospitalizations involving 204 patients who received at least 1 dose of metformin during inpatient admission. Patients had at least 1 absolute contraindication to metformin therapy in 71 admissions (27%). In 29 (41%) of these 71 admissions, treatment with metformin continued despite the contraindication. The most common contraindication, elevated serum creatinine concentration, was present or developed during 32 admissions (12%); however, metformin use was appropriately discontinued in only 8 (25%) of these 32 patients. Of the precautions against metformin use, concomitant administration of cationic agents was the most common, occurring in 97 admissions (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients are treated with metformin despite having clinical conditions that place them at risk for developing lactic acidosis. To minimize this risk, it is essential that prescribers develop a better understanding of the prescribing guidelines for metformin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals.
Clement, S., Braithwaite, S. S., Magee, M. F., Ahmann, A., Smith, E. P., Schafer, R. G., Hirsch, I. B., & on behalf of the Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.553 · Cited by 1,266
Umpierrez, G. E., Hellman, R., Korytkowski, M. T., Kosiborod, M., Maynard, G. A., Montori, V. M., Seley, J. J., & Van den Berghe, G. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2098 · Cited by 1,126
Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Salpeter, S. R., Greyber, E., Pasternak, G. A., & Salpeter (posthumous), E. E. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002967.pub4 · Cited by 893
Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: current perspectives on causes and risk
DeFronzo, R., Fleming, G. A., Chen, K., & Bicsak, T. A. (2016) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.014 · Cited by 658
Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review
Inzucchi, S. E., Lipska, K. J., Mayo, H., Bailey, C. J., & McGuire, D. K. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15298 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Calabrese, A. T., Coley, K. C., DaPos, S. V., Swanson, D., & Rao, R. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-02-25
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062141355
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Prescribing Practices: Risk of Lactic Acidosis With Metformin Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.162.4.434
- The paper
- Calabrese, A. T., Coley, K. C., DaPos, S. V., Swanson, D., & Rao, R. H. (2002). Evaluation of Prescribing Practices: Risk of Lactic Acidosis With Metformin Therapy. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.4.434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.