A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with atrial fibrillation and a low risk for stroke while taking aspirin
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to derive and internally validate a simple and easily applied clinical prediction rule to identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) whose stroke risk while taking aspirin is, irrespective of age, low enough that oral anticoagulation therapy is unnecessary. METHODS: We included 2501 patients with AF treated with aspirin during participation in 6 clinical trials. Patients were randomly divided into derivation and validation sets. Recursive partitioning was used to identify patients in the derivation set whose risk for stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or transient ischemic attack was comparable to that observed in an age- and sex-matched cohort from the Framingham Heart Study. The derived prediction rules were tested on the validation set. RESULTS: Overall, 166 patients (6.6%) had an event during 4688.6 person-years (PYs) of observation for an incident rate of 3.5 events per 100 PYs. Patients in the derivation set classified as low risk (no previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, no treated hypertension or systolic blood pressure equal to or exceeding 140 mm Hg, no symptomatic coronary artery disease, and no diabetes) experienced 1.0 events per 100 PYs, compared with an age- and sex-matched rate of 1.2 events per 100 PYs. In the validation set, low-risk patients experienced 1.1 events per 100 PYs (expected rate of 1.2 events per 100 PYs). Low-risk patients made up 24% of the cohort and 16% of patients older than 75 years. Low-risk patients who were randomized to therapeutic oral anticoagulation therapy experienced 1.5 events per 100 PYs. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of age, patients with AF and none of these 4 clinical features and who take aspirin have stroke rates comparable to those of age-matched community cohorts and would not benefit substantially from anticoagulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simple, clinically applicable stroke risk-stratification schemes in AF patients were developed in the late 1990s in small cohort studies and later refined and validated in larger populations.
“Simple, clinically applicable stroke risk-stratification schemes in AF patients were developed in the late 1990s in small cohort studies and have later been refined and validated in larger populations.[364][365][366][367][368]”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [366]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 209
- Authors
- van Walraven, C., Hart, R. G., Wells, G. A., Petersen, P., Koudstaal, P. J., Gullov, A. L., Hellemons, B. S. P., Koefed, B. G., & Laupacis, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-04-28
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 936
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033306249
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, aspirin, stroke risk, clinical prediction rules, oral anticoagulation, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease
- MeSH terms
- Aspirin, Atrial Fibrillation, Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Support Techniques, Fibrinolytic Agents, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review