The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Get With the Guidelines for Cardiovascular Secondary Prevention: Pilot Results
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of Web-based technology and a collaborative model to improve hospital adherence to secondary prevention guidelines has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-four hospitals in Massachusetts participated in a collaborative that met quarterly, with didactic and best-practice presentations and interactive multidisciplinary team workshops. A customized tool kit and interactive, Web-based management tool were used for data collection and on-line feedback. Data from 1738 patients admitted with coronary artery disease were collected by hospital staff from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2001. Outcome measures included differences between baseline and 10- to 12-month follow-up measurements of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, cholesterol measurement and treatment, smoking cessation counseling, blood pressure control, and cardiac rehabilitation referral. RESULTS: Clinically and statistically significant increases from baseline to 10- to 12-month follow-up were demonstrated in smoking cessation counseling (48% [95% confidence interval [CI], 36.6%-58.4%] to 87% [95% CI, 73.1%-100.7%]), lipid treatment (54% [95% CI, 46.6%-70.2%] to 79% [95% CI, 70.2%-88.3%]), lipid measurement (59% [95% CI, 51.5%-66.0%] to 81% [95% CI, 72.0%-89.5%]), and cardiac rehabilitation referral (34% [95% CI, 25.9%-39.7%] to 73% [95% CI, 63.2%-82.9%]). An improving trend was seen in blood pressure control (60% [95% CI, 55.3%-65.6%] to 68% [95% CI, 60.2%-76.1%]). High baseline use was maintained for use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a collaborative quality improvement initiative, interactive training of hospital teams with physician champions, and the use of an interactive Web-based Patient Management Tool enhanced adherence to prevention guidelines in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Davis, D., O'Brien, M. A. T., Freemantle, N., Wolf, F. M., Mazmanian, P., & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.9.867 · Cited by 2,364
Soumerai, S. B., McLaughlin, T. J., Gurwitz, J. H., Guadagnoli, E., Hauptman, P. J., Borbas, C., Morris, N., McLaughlin, B., Gao, X., Willison, D. J., et al. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.17.1358 · Cited by 479
Cited by
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines.
Tricoci, P. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.205 · Cited by 908
Douglas, S. L., Daly, B. J., Kelley, C. G., O’Toole, E., & Montenegro, H. (2007) · American Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.4037/ajcc2007.16.5.447 · Cited by 82
Hiratzka, L. F., Eagle, K. A., Liang, L., Fonarow, G. C., LaBresh, K. A., & Peterson, E. D. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.681247 · Cited by 75
Self-citationCavender, M. A., Rassi, A. N., Fonarow, G. C., Cannon, C. P., Peacock, W. F., Laskey, W. K., Hernandez, A. F., Peterson, E. D., Cox, M., Grau‐Sepulveda, M., et al. (2013) · Clinical Cardiology · doi:10.1002/clc.22213 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- LaBresh, K. A., Ellrodt, A. G., Gliklich, R., Liljestrand, J., & Peto, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-01-26
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203
- ISSN
- 0003-9926
- OpenAlex
- W2016703983
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Get With the Guidelines for Cardiovascular Secondary Prevention: Pilot Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.164.2.203
- The paper
- LaBresh, K. A., Ellrodt, A. G., Gliklich, R., Liljestrand, J., & Peto, R. (2004). Get With the Guidelines for Cardiovascular Secondary Prevention: Pilot Results. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.2.203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.