The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Longitudinal Follow-up and Outcomes Among a Population With Chronic Kidney Disease in a Large Managed Care Organization
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is the primary cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States. The purpose of this study was to understand the natural history of chronic kidney disease with regard to progression to renal replacement therapy (transplant or dialysis) and death in a representative patient population. METHODS: In 1996 we identified 27 998 patients in our health plan who had estimated glomerular filtration rates of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) on 2 separate measurements at least 90 days apart. We followed up patients from the index date of the first glomerular filtration rates of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) until renal replacement therapy, death, disenrollment from the health plan, or June 30, 2001. We extracted from the computerized medical records the prevalence of the following comorbidities at the index date and end point: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and renal anemia. RESULTS: Our data showed that the rate of renal replacement therapy over the 5-year observation period was 1.1%, 1.3%, and 19.9%, respectively, for the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) stages 2, 3, and 4, but that the mortality rate was 19.5%, 24.3%, and 45.7%. Thus, death was far more common than dialysis at all stages. In addition, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and anemia were more prevalent in the patients who died but hypertension prevalence was similar across all stages. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that efforts to reduce mortality in this population should be focused on treatment and prevention of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and anemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gerstein, H. C. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.4.421 · Cited by 2,440
Cited by
Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States
Coresh, J., Selvin, E., Stevens, L. A., Manzi, J., Kusek, J. W., Eggers, P., Van Lente, F., & Levey, A. S. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2038 · Cited by 4,895
Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives
Jha, V., Garcia-Garcia, G., Iseki, K., Li, Z., Naicker, S., Plattner, B., Saran, R., Wang, A. Y.-M., & Yang, C.-W. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60687-x · Cited by 4,383
Webster, A. C., Nagler, E. V., Morton, R. L., & Masson, P. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32064-5 · Cited by 3,842
Assessing Kidney Function — Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
Stevens, L. A., Coresh, J., Greene, T., & Levey, A. S. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054415 · Cited by 2,952
Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Management: A Review
Chen, T. K., Knicely, D. H., & Grams, M. E. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.14745 · Cited by 1,811
Metadata
- Authors
- Keith, D. S., Nichols, G. A., Gullion, C. M., Brown, J. B., & Smith, D. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-03-22
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 659
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091886687
- Cited by
- 1,684
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal Follow-up and Outcomes Among a Population With Chronic Kidney Disease in a Large Managed Care Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.164.6.659
- The paper
- Keith, D. S., Nichols, G. A., Gullion, C. M., Brown, J. B., & Smith, D. H. (2004). Longitudinal Follow-up and Outcomes Among a Population With Chronic Kidney Disease in a Large Managed Care Organization. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.6.659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.