The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacteriuria and Pyelonephritis of Pregnancy
Abstract
The interpretation of bacterial cultures of the urine has been greatly aided by the use of quantitative methods. Analysis of the bacterial colony counts of urines obtained from large numbers of patients has indicated that, except for certain defined clinical circumstances,1a colony count greater than 100,000 per milliliter of freshly obtained urine generally indicates the presence of true bacteriuria, that is, of actual multiplication of bacteria within the urinary tract. Conversely, bacterial colony counts less than 100,000 usually represent contamination attendant upon the collection of the specimen.2,3 The validity of this approach has been amply confirmed,4-6despite some earlier and relatively minor disagreements that have since been largely resolved.7The quantitative approach has been of value not only in defining the presence or absence of infection of the urinary tract in the usual clinical setting, but also it has provided a means for determining the presence of asymptomatic infection
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relation between Pyelonephritis and Bacterial Counts in the Urine: An Autopsy Study
MacDonald, R. A., Levitin, H., Mallory, G. K., Kass, E. H., & Norton, J. C. (1957) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm195705162562001 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of premature birth and subclinical infection
Gibbs, R. S., Romero, R., Hillier, S. L., Eschenbach, D. A., & Sweet, R. L. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91628-n · Cited by 891
Lee, A. C., Mullany, L. C., Koffi, A. K., Rafiqullah, I., Khanam, R., Folger, L. V., Rahman, M., Mitra, D. K., Labrique, A., Christian, P., et al. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2665-0 · Cited by 336
Whalley, P. (1967) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(67)90458-9 · Cited by 268
Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection
Reid, G. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.437s · Cited by 259
Controversies in the laboratory diagnosis of community-acquired urinary tract infection
Morgan, M. G., & McKenzie, H. (1993) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/bf01970954 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- KASS, E. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1960-02-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053500164
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteriuria and Pyelonephritis of Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.1960.00270140016003
- The paper
- KASS, E. H. (1960). Bacteriuria and Pyelonephritis of Pregnancy. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1960.00270140016003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.