Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment

Bernard Lo·1986·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Medical, ethical, and legal guidelines recommend that decisions about life-sustaining treatment be made jointly by physicians and competent, informed patients.1-4Many patients, however, are incompetent when such decisions must be made.5For these patients, it is recommended that clinicians follow wishes that the patient had previously expressed when competent.1-4Although such advance directives respect patient autonomy, several reservations about them have been raised.2,4,6Patients may not want to discuss life-sustaining treatment in advance, may not deliberate about their preferences, or may change their minds as their disease worsens and decisions become real rather than hypothetical. Physicians may fear that such discussions will cause the patient to become anxious or depressed. Refusal of treatment may be due to reversible medical or psychosocial problems.7To address these issues, we administered questionnaires to outpatients who might require decisions about life-sustaining treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS The site of the

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/archinte.146.8.1613

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Lo, B.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1986-08-01
Volume
146
Issue
8
Pages
1613-1613
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011862193
Cited by
322
References
0
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.146.8.1613
The paper
Lo, B. (1986). Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.146.8.1613

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.