The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Albendazole Therapy for Neurocysticercosis
Abstract
Seven patients with chronic parenchymal brain cysticercosis were treated with albendazole for one month at daily doses of 15 mg/kg of body weight. Computed tomographic follow-up studies were made at the following times: a mean of 16 months before the trial; the beginning of treatment; the end of treatment; and three months afterward. Computed tomographic studies at the beginning of treatment showed a total of 157 cysts, the last day of treatment the number had decreased to 39 cysts, and three months later, the total number of lesions was 22; this represents 86% improvement in the number of cystic lesions. Control studies in the same group of patients had shown chronic persistence of lesions without spontaneous improvement in most cases. Two patients had been treated with praziquantel previously with partial response; in both cases albendazole therapy was effective with 100% and 77% improvement. We conclude that albendazole is highly effective for the treatment of parenchymal brain cysticercosis. It is also effective in patients who had shown poor therapeutic response to praziquantel.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it was also effective in patients who had shown poor therapeutic response to praziquantel [155]”
From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [155]
In the citing paper
“albendazole (15 mg/kg daily for 30 days) was highly effective for treatment of patients with brain parenchymal cysticercosis”
From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [155]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update
Chai, J.-Y., Jung, B.-K., & Hong, S.-J. (2021) · The Korean Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.3347/kjp.2021.59.3.189 · Cited by 286
Albendazole therapy for subarachnoid and ventricular cysticercosis: Case report
del Brutto, O. H., & Sotelo, J. (1990) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1990.72.5.0816 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Escobedo, F.
- Corresponding author
- Escobedo, Francisco
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1987-04-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 738
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067558689
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Mollusks and Parasites Studies
- Keywords
- neurocysticercosis, albendazole, praziquantel, antiparasitic treatment, cystic lesions, computed tomography follow-up, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anthelmintics, Benzimidazoles, Brain Diseases, Cysticercosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Praziquantel, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Albendazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review