Cited by 45

Effectiveness of the 4-mg Dose of Nicotine Polacrilex for the Initial Treatment of High-Dependent Smokers

Sachs, David P. L.·1995·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To determine the effectiveness of the 4-mg and 2-mg dosages of nicotine polacrilex vs placebo through the first 6 weeks of treatment (during which 75% of relapse occurs when there is no treatment) in assisting high-dependent smokers to stop smoking when instructed to use a fixed number (12 pieces) of medication daily. Subjects and methods Ninety high-dependent (Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire score > or = 7 plus baseline carbon monoxide level > 15 ppm) healthy male and female smokers, highly motivated to quit smoking, were enrolled in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which they were instructed to use 12 pieces per day of their assigned dosage formulation: 4 mg, 2 mg, or 0.5 mg (placebo) of nicotine polacrilex. The behavioral intervention did not depend on providing any special psychological training, skills, or services but rather employed a standard medical practice model that could easily be implemented by any primary care physician. Results Sustained abstinence from weeks 2 through 6, determined at each visit by absolutely no cigarette use plus a carbon monoxide level of 8 ppm or lower was 59% (4-mg group), 30% (2-mg group), and 39% (placebo group) (P or = 7 plus baseline smoking serum cotinine level > 250 ng/mL plus baseline carbon monoxide level > 15 ppm), results were 63% (4-mg group), 25% (2-mg group), and 25% (placebo group) (P Conclusions It appears that the 4-mg dose of nicotine polacrilex is the drug and dose of choice for…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430180077009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medically approved oral smoking cessation aids such as nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges with a higher nicotine content and which give greater nicotine delivery to users have previously been shown to be more effective in assisting smoking cessation than products with a lower nicotine content, particularly in more heavily dependent smokers.

    “medically approved oral smoking cessation aids such as nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges with a higher nicotine content and which give greater nicotine delivery to users [36] have previously been shown to be more effective in assisting smoking cessation than products with a lower nicotine content, particularly in more heavily dependent smokers [37–40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachs, D. P. L.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1995-10-09
Volume
155
Issue
18
Pages
1973
ISSN
0003-9926
Cited by
45
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review