The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Meta-analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Toxicity of Pneumocystis carinii Prophylactic Regimens
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Finding the optimal strategy for Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection can be problematic. Several prophylactic regimens are available, but their relative efficacy and tolerance are not well understood. METHODS: A meta-analysis overviewed 35 randomized trials comparing different regimens for P carinii prophylaxis directly or with placebo. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. On-treatment data were also analyzed when available. RESULTS: Regardless of dose, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim was almost universally effective for patients who tolerated it. The risk of discontinuing sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim because of side effects decreased by 43% (95% confidence interval, 30% to 54%) if one double-strength tablet was given three times a week instead of daily. For dapsone, among 100 patients given 100 mg daily instead of twice a week for 1 year (primary prophylaxis), seven fewer patients would develop P carinii pneumonia, but 17 more would have significant toxic reactions. Aerosolized pentamidine was well tolerated regardless of the dose used. Prophylaxis failures might be halved if the dose of aerosolized pentamidine were doubled. Compared with aerosolized pentamidine, oral regimens prevented 73% (95% confidence interval, 57% to 82%) of toxoplasmosis events by on-treatment analysis, but only 33% (95% confidence interval, 12% to 50%) by intention-to-treat. No significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between different regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim is the superior regimen, and low doses could improve tolerance without losing effectiveness for primary prophylaxis. Low doses of dapsone reduce toxic effects, but at the expense of some loss of efficacy. There are few data on the use of low-dose regimens for secondary prophylaxis. High doses of aerosolized pentamidine may improve the efficacy of this regimen. Aerosolized pentamidine is inadequate for prevention of toxoplasmosis, and strategies that improve the tolerance of oral regimens may increase effectiveness in preventing toxoplasmosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green, H., Paul, M., Vidal, L., & Leibovici, L. (2007) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/82.9.1052 · Cited by 379
Fishman, J. A., Gans, H., & Practice, T. A. I. D. C. O. (2019) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.13587 · Cited by 293
Losina, E., Schackman, B. R., Sadownik, S. N., Gebo, K. A., Walensky, R. P., Chiosi, J. J., Weinstein, M. C., Hicks, P. L., Aaronson, W. H., Moore, R. D., et al. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/644772 · Cited by 180
Kazanjian, P., Locke, A. B., Hossler, P. A., Lane, B. R., Bartlett, M. S., Smith, J. W., Cannon, M., & Meshnick, S. R. (1998) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/00002030-199808000-00009 · Cited by 171
Emergence of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in the AIDS era.
Martin, J. N., Rose, D. A., Hadley, W. K., Perdreau‐Remington, F., Lam, P. K., & Gerberding, J. L. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/315132 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Ioannidis, J. P. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-01-22
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963733265
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta-analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Toxicity of Pneumocystis carinii Prophylactic Regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440020081010
- The paper
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (1996). A Meta-analysis of the Relative Efficacy and Toxicity of Pneumocystis carinii Prophylactic Regimens. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440020081010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.