Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Efficacy of Aspirin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Pooled Data From 3 Randomized Trials

·1997·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Six randomized studies of the use of oral anticoagulation therapy have demonstrated that the relative risk of stroke is decreased by approximately 68%. Three of these studies also compared aspirin with placebo use in a double-blind design. We pooled individual patient data from these 3 studies. Objectives: To determine if there were subgroups of patients who were particularly responsive to aspirin use and to determine the efficacy of aspirin compared with placebo use in the broad spectrum of patients with AF. Methods: There were 1985 patient-years assigned to the aspirin and 1867 patient-years assigned to the placebo groups in the analysis. The daily dose of aspirin was 75 mg in the Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, Anticoagulation Study, 325 mg in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation 1 Study, and 300 mg in the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial. The European Atrial Fibrillation Trial was a secondary prevention trial, while the other 2 were primary prevention studies. The primary end point in this analysis was ischemic stroke. Results: At the time of randomization, the patients' mean age was 70 years and the mean blood pressure was 145/83 mm Hg. Sixty-two percent of patients were male, 46% had a history of hypertension, 35% had a previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, and 19% had intermittent AF. Although aspirin use seemed particularly effective in younger patients and in those with hypertension in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation 1 Study, this was not the case in the other studies. No other subgroups particularly responsive to aspirin therapy were identified. When patients from all the studies were combined, the relative risk reduction with aspirin therapy was 21% (95% confidence interval, 0%-38%; P=.05). Conclusions: A subgroup of patients with AF that has a particularly large reduction in stroke incidence from aspirin therapy was not convincingly identified. The data from the combined analysis of these 3 randomized trials suggest a small effect of aspirin use in preventing stroke in patients with AF. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1237-1240

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440320143013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1997-06-09
Volume
157
Issue
11
Pages
1237
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210743996
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficacy of Aspirin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Pooled Data From 3 Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440320143013
The paper
The Efficacy of Aspirin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Pooled Data From 3 Randomized Trials. (1997). Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440320143013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.