National Patterns of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Use in Congestive Heart Failure
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is supported by the results of clinical trials and expert guidelines, national physician practices are unknown. METHODS: We analyzed 1529 physician office visits by patients with CHF available from the 1989 through 1994 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. We examined changes over time in the use of ACE inhibitors and use of other medications for CHF. Potential clinical and nonclinical predictors of use of ACE inhibitors were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The prevalence of CHF increased from 0.9% of all office visits in 1989 to 1.1% in 1994. Use of ACE inhibitors increased from 24% in visits by patients with CHF in 1989 to 31% in 1994 (P = .02). From 1989 through 1994, use of ACE inhibitors was more likely in visits to cardiologists (46% vs 22% for all other physicians), in the Midwest (31% vs 24% in all other regions), in whites (27% vs 21% in nonwhites), in privately insured patients (31% vs 24% in all others), and in men (29% vs 23% in women). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed independent effects of specialty, region, and sex. Other medications commonly used for patients with CHF included diuretics (62% of visits for 1989-1994), digoxin (38%), and calcium channel antagonists (15%). Use of diuretics showed no significant trend between 1989 and 1994, whereas use of digoxin decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: The low rates of use of ACE inhibitors in patients with CHF and the wide variations in their use suggest a need to move beyond clinical trials and focus attention on modifying physician practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies found that guideline-directed therapies were initially adopted more slowly and underused among female patients.
“This is consistent with findings from prior studies42,43,44,45,46 of female patients in which guideline-directed therapies were initially adopted more slowly and underused among female patients.”
From Association of race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use among patients with diabetes in the US (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.167586 · Cited by 2,251 · see citing works
Eberly, L. A., Yang, L., Eneanya, N. D., Essien, U., Julien, H., Nathan, A. S., Khatana, S. A. M., Dayoub, E. J., Fanaroff, A. C., Giri, J., et al. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6139 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Underutilisation of ACE inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure.
Bungard, T. J., McAlister, F. A., Johnson, J. A., & Tsuyuki, R. T. (2001) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200161140-00002 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stafford, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stafford, Randall S.
- ORCID
- Stafford, Randall S.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-11-24
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2460
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069410101
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS07892)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL03548)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
- Keywords
- ACE inhibitors, congestive heart failure, prescribing patterns, physician practice variation, diuretics, digoxin, calcium channel blockers, regional variation, sex differences, insurance status, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Drug Utilization, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review