CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Healthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Policy and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Typology of Specialists' Clinical Roles

Christopher B Forrest·2009·Archives of Internal Medicine
DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.114
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

High use of specialist physicians and specialized procedures coupled with low exposure to primary care are distinguishing traits of the US health care system. Although the tasks of the primary care medical home are well established, consensus on the normative clinical roles of specialist physicians has not been achieved, which makes it unlikely that the specialist workforce is being used most effectively and efficiently. This article describes a typology of specialists' clinical roles that is based on the conceptual basis for health care specialism and empirical evaluations of the specialty referral process. The report concludes with a discussion on the implications of the typology for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the primary-specialty care interface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Forrest, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Christopher B Forrest
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2009-06-08
Volume
169
Issue
11
Pages
1062
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archinternmed.2009.114
OpenAlex
W1576730632
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
patient-centered medical home, specialist workforce, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Medicine, Physician's Role, Physicians, Family, Referral and Consultation, Specialization, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review