Cited by 155Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Prognostic Value of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction in Resistant Hypertension

Muxfeldt, Elizabeth Silaid, Cardoso, Claudia Regina Lopes, Salles, Gil Fernando·2009·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) reduction in resistant hypertension (RH) is unknown. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate its importance as a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. METHODS: At baseline, 556 patients with RH underwent clinical and laboratory examinations and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. The primary end points were a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Multiple Cox regression was used to assess associations between the nocturnal BP reduction and the subsequent end points. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 1-103 months), 109 patients (19.6%) reached the composite end point, with 70 all-cause and 46 cardiovascular deaths. A nondipping pattern was present in 360 patients (65.0%). After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, smoking status, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, previous cardiovascular disease, number of antihypertensive drugs in use, and office and 24-hour ambulatory BP readings, the nondipping pattern was an independent predictor of the composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.71) and of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.09-4.92). In subgroup analysis, the reduced (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.03-2.83) and reverted (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.04-3.43) dipping patterns were predictive of total cardiovascular events. The effect of the nondipping pattern on cardiovascular prognosis was stronger in younger patients and in those with true RH. CONCLUSIONS: The nocturnal BP variability patterns provide valuable prognostic information for stratification of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk in patients with RH, above and beyond other traditional cardiovascular risk factors and mean ambulatory BP levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.68

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 155

Authors
Muxfeldt, E. S., Cardoso, C. R. L., & Salles, G. F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2009-05-11
Volume
169
Issue
9
Pages
874
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027600567
Cited by
155
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
resistant hypertension, nocturnal blood pressure dipping, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, prognostic factors, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Disease-Free Survival, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review