Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Cat Brain.

Hagamen, W. D.·1962·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

These hard-cover atlases consist of photographs of Nissl and Weil sections at 0.5 mm. intervals. There are no line drawings or outlining of structures, but the quality of the staining and photographs is excellent and all structures are easily recognized. If one desires more precise delineation of such things as the thalamic nuclei or the subdivisions of the amygdala, he should be prepared to obtain this information by a study of his own slides and reference to research articles on the region in question. Measurements obtained from a large number of brains were utilized in establishing the criteria for the normal brain. In addition, the Weil and Nissl sections at each level were taken from two different animals to give some indication of the average range of variability. The tissue was cut at 40μ by frozen section technique to assure minimal shrinkage. The cat sections were photographed at × 13

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1962.04210060107009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Hagamen, W. D.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1962-12-01
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
589-589
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092435055
Cited by
420
References
0
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Cat Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1962.04210060107009
The paper
Hagamen, W. D. (1962). A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Cat Brain. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1962.04210060107009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.