The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitation of Touch-Pressure Sensation
Abstract
Touch-pressure sensation at regularly spaced points on the index finger and great toe of humans of various ages was measured using a recently developed instrument which allows for exact placement of stylus tip, exact stylus area, and wide range of intensity of stimuli with defined and constant wave form. The threshold of touch-pressure sensation was higher in the toe than in the finger, in the old than in the young, and, in persons over the age of 40 years, in men than in women. If our sampling is sufficient, these differences cannot be explained entirely on the basis of a less-dense distribution of receptors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been widely demonstrated that tactile sensibility declines with age, as evidenced by increased sensory thresholds (Dyck et al. 1972;Gescheider et al. 1994;Thornbury and Mistretta 1981;Verrillo 1980) and decreased spatial acuity (Manning and Tremblay 2006;Stevens and Choo 1996;Stevens and Patterson 1995;Tremblay et al. 2003;Woodward 1993).”
From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Dyck et al. 1972
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tactile innervation densities across the whole body
Corniani, G., & Saal, H. P. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00313.2020 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyck, P. J., Schultz, P. W., & O'Brien, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- ORCID
- Dyck, P. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1972-05-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 465-473
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043861886
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
- Keywords
- tactile threshold, index finger, hallux, age differences, sex differences, tactile receptors
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pressure, Sensory Receptor Cells, Toes, Touch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review