Cited by 83Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Multiple Sclerosis: The Problem of Incorrect Diagnosis

Rudick, Richard A.·1986·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Various neurologic disorders may be diagnosed incorrectly as multiple sclerosis (MS) since there is no test that is entirely specific for the disease. We report ten patients who met clinical criteria for probable or definite MS and who were given incorrect diagnoses. All of the patients were subsequently shown to have alternative diagnoses, three of which were directly treatable. From these illustrative cases, five characteristics were identified that alerted us to the possibility of an alternative diagnosis. We have called these characteristics "red flags," and suggest that they may be useful as features casting doubt on the diagnosis of MS if used judiciously in conjunction with clinical diagnostic criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520060042015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudick, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Rudick, Richard A.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1986-06-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
578
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131726821
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r23ns020838-03, 5k07ns000791-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (KO7 NS 00791, R23 NS 20838)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, misdiagnosis, differential diagnosis, red flags, diagnostic criteria, neurological disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Diagnostic Errors, Eye, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Remission, Spontaneous, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review