The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Right Cerebral Dominance in Spatial Attention: Further Evidence Based on Ipsilateral Neglect
Abstract
Tasks based on visuomotor scanning and tactile exploration were used to quantitate neglect behavior in patients with unilateral brain damage and in normal control subjects. The results confirm previous observations that contralateral neglect is markedly more severe following right-hemisphere injury and that it is independent of the modality of sensory input or motor output. In addition, patients with right-hemisphere injury also showed multimodal neglect for targets in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the brain lesion. The emergence of both contralateral and ipsilateral neglect in these patients strongly supports a model of right-hemispheric dominance for the distribution of attention within the extrapersonal space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498
Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions OF the right cerebral hemisphere
BRAIN, W. R. (1941) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/64.4.244 · Cited by 735
Cited by
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Mesulam, M.-M. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0482 · Cited by 1,096
CASEY, B. J., CASTELLANOS, F. X., GIEDD, J. N., MARSH, W. L., HAMBURGER, S. D., SCHUBERT, A. B., VAUSS, Y. C., VAITUZIS, A. C., DICKSTEIN, D. P., SARFATTI, S. E., et al. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199703000-00016 · Cited by 800
Tuch, D. S., Salat, D. H., Wisco, J. J., Zaleta, A. K., Hevelone, N. D., & Rosas, H. D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407259102 · Cited by 364
Coull, J. T., Nobre, A. C., & Frith, C. D. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.1.73 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Weintraub, S.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1987-06-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 621
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057891999
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Right Cerebral Dominance in Spatial Attention: Further Evidence Based on Ipsilateral Neglect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1987.00520180043014
- The paper
- Weintraub, S. (1987). Right Cerebral Dominance in Spatial Attention: Further Evidence Based on Ipsilateral Neglect. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1987.00520180043014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
