Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Hyperthermic Syndrome in Two Subjects With Acute Hydrocephalus

Talman, W. T., Florek, G., Bullard, D. E.·1988·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Although intracranial hypertension may cause autonomic disturbances, as well as alterations in the regulation of body temperature, an acute hyperthermic syndrome with autonomic disturbance as a consequence of hydrocephalus has not been described previously. Two subjects presented with such a syndrome, with each of several episodes of acute shunt failure and hydrocephalus. With correction of the hydrocephalus, the autonomic disturbances and fever immediately cleared. Observations from human and experimental studies suggest some potential mechanisms for the development of the syndrome. One of the subjects of this report was being treated with neuroleptics at the time of hospitalization; in him, and potentially in other similar patients, the syndrome could easily be confused with the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The need for prompt appreciation of the correct diagnosis was emphasized by the rapid clearing of all neurological signs after correction of the shunt malfunction in both of these patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520330129022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Talman, W. T., Florek, G., & Bullard, D. E.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1988-09-01
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1037-1040
ISSN
0003-9942
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review