The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale
Abstract
The interobserver reliability of a rating scale employed in several multicenter stroke trials was investigated. Twenty patients who had a stroke were rated with this scale by four clinical stroke fellows. Each patient was independently evaluated by one pair of observers. The degree of interrater agreement for each item on the scale was determined by calculation of the kappa statistic. Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for 9 of 13 items. This rating system compares favorably with other scales for which such comparisons can be made. However, the validity of this system must be established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Cited by
Stummer, W., Pichlmeier, U., Meinel, T., Wiestler, O. D., Zanella, F., & Reulen, H.-J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 · Cited by 3,423
Adams, H. P., Davis, P. H., Leira, E. C., Chang, K.-C., Bendixen, B. H., Clarke, W. R., Woolson, R. F., & Hansen, M. D. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.1.126 · Cited by 1,456
Chollet, F., Tardy, J., Albucher, J.-F., Thalamas, C., Berard, E., Lamy, C., Bejot, Y., Deltour, S., Jaillard, A., Niclot, P., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70314-8 · Cited by 925
DeKosky, S. T., Ikonomovic, M. D., Styren, S. D., Beckett, L., Wisniewski, S., Bennett, D. A., Cochran, E. J., Kordower, J. H., & Mufson, E. J. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10069 · Cited by 686
Post‐stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery
Jokinen, H., Melkas, S., Ylikoski, R., Pohjasvaara, T., Kaste, M., Erkinjuntti, T., & Hietanen, M. (2015) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.12743 · Cited by 467
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, L. B., Bertels, C., & Davis, J. N.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 660-662
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093072754
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026
- The paper
- Goldstein, L. B., Bertels, C., & Davis, J. N. (1989). Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
