IgG Reactivity in the Spinal Cord and Motor Cortex in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Abstract
The spinal cord and motor cortex of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were examined with immunohistochemical methods for the presence of IgG. In 13 of 15 spinal cords, a population of motoneurons stained positively for IgG in a granular pattern, characteristic of binding to the rough endoplasmic reticulum. In 6 of 11 motor cortices, a proportion of pyramidal cells also stained positively for IgG. No such reactivity was noted in motoneurons of control human tissues, although positive IgG staining was present in astrocytes of ALS and control specimens. Reactive microglia and/or macrophages were detected in the territory of degenerating pyramidal tracts and ventral horns. The surface of most of these cells stained positively for IgG, and 50% stained positively for HLA-DR. The accumulation of IgG in motoneurons and the presence of immunologically active macrophages provide additional evidence for the participation of immunologic factors in the pathogenesis of ALS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blood-brain barrier and blood-spinal cord barrier are damaged in a subset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, with plasma-derived IgG accumulation in spinal cord and motor cortex in 40-90% of cases and peripheral blood cell accumulation in 70-100% of cases.
“These findings support earlier observations showing that the BBB and BSCB are damaged in a subset of ALS patients as demonstrated by accumulation of plasma-derived IgG in the spinal cord and motor cortex in 40% (154) to 90% (163) of studied cases, and accumulation of peripheral blood cells in 70% (164) to 100% (599) of studied cases.”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [163]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- Engelhardt, J. I., & Appel, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Appel, S. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1210-1216
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086300835
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, IgG reactivity, spinal cord, motor cortex, motor neurons, pyramidal neurons, astrocytes, microglia, macrophages, HLA-DR, rough endoplasmic reticulum
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Female, Fluoresceins, HLA-DR Antigens, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunohistochemistry, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Pyramidal Tracts, Spinal Cord, Thiocyanates, Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review