The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Background Review and Current Concepts of Reperfusion Injury
Abstract
We define the concept of reperfusion injury, and we present a background chronology of experimental work supporting and questioning this concept. We identify several new influences, such as current clinical interest in thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemia of heart and brain and the growing recognition of endothelium as a regulator of homeostasis. We propose that these influences will encourage a reexamination of reperfusion injury as a factor in the ultimate outcome of tissue exposed to reversible ischemia. We briefly discuss the major mechanisms presently implicated in reperfusion injury--loss of calcium homeostasis, free radical generation, leukocyte-mediated injury, and acute hypercholesterolemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor
Palmer, R. M. J., Ferrige, A. G., & Moncada, S. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/327524a0 · Cited by 10,704
Cited by
'Malignant' Middle Cerebral Artery Territory Infarction: Clinical Course and Prognostic Signs
Hacke, W. (1996) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040037012 · Cited by 1,352
Inflammatory Mediators and Stroke: New Opportunities for Novel Therapeutics
Barone, F. C., & Feuerstein, G. Z. (1999) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-199908000-00001 · Cited by 930
Zhang, X., Yan, H., Yuan, Y., Gao, J., Shen, Z., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Wang, R.-R., Wang, X., Hu, W.-W., et al. (2013) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.25132 · Cited by 510
Belayev, L., Busto, R., Zhao, W., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1996) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00815-3 · Cited by 506
Adams, H. P., Brott, T. G., Crowell, R. M., Furlan, A. J., Gomez, C. R., Grotta, J., Helgason, C. M., Marler, J. R., Woolson, R. F., & Zivin, J. A. (1994) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.25.9.1901 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Hallenbeck, J. M., & Dutka, A. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1245-1254
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131659895
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Background Review and Current Concepts of Reperfusion Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1990.00530110107027
- The paper
- Hallenbeck, J. M., & Dutka, A. J. (1990). Background Review and Current Concepts of Reperfusion Injury. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1990.00530110107027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
