Cited by 93Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

Suicide and Patients With Neurologic Diseases: Methodologic Problems

Stenager, Elsebeth Nylev·1992·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Objective The suicide risk in patients with many neurologic diseases has been reported to be greater than that in the general population. Studies on the subject are, however, often encumbered with methodologic problems. We appraised these problems and, based on an evaluation, reappraised knowledge of the suicide risk in patients with specific neurologic diseases. Data source Using the computerized database MEDLINE, we identified all published reports with the key words suicide, attempted suicide, and neurologic diseases. Study selection We assessed and reviewed studies concerning the most common neurologic diseases for methodologic problems in the study design. Data extraction The following methodologic problems emerged during our review: (1) choice of study type, ie, autopsy study or follow-up study; (2) choice of study population; (3) choice of control groups; (4) epidemiologic/statistical methods used; and (5) validity of statistics reported. Data synthesis We analyzed the methodologic problems in studies of patients with multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington's chorea, spinal cord lesions, cranial trauma, brain tumors, Parkinson's disease, vascular disorders, and migraine. In most of the studies, the methods used gave rise to uncertainty about the conclusion presented. Conclusion An increased suicide risk was found in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis and spinal cord lesions as well as in selected groups of patients with epilepsy. In other neurologic diseases,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360098025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of medical illnesses do not appear to increase risk for suicide, including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and hypertension.

    “the majority of medical illnesses do not appear to actually increase risk for suicide, including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and hypertension (Harris & Barraclough, 1997; Stenager & Stenager, 1992)”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Stenager & Stenager, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stenager, E. N.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Stenager, Elsebeth Nylev
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1992-12-01
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
1296
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070896139
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicide risk, neurological disorders, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, spinal cord lesions, cranial trauma, brain tumors, Parkinson's disease, vascular disease, migraine, research design, control groups, study population
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Brain Neoplasms, Epilepsy, Humans, Huntington Disease, Migraine Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis, Nervous System Diseases, Parkinson Disease, Spinal Cord Injuries, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review