The Neuropsychology of the Prefrontal Cortex
Abstract
Single photon emission computed tomography with the xenon inhalation technique is used to compare activation of regional cerebral blood flow in frontal brain regions during the performance of four widely used neuropsychological tests: the Continuous Performance Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Tower of London, and Porteus Mazes. Healthy normal volunteers performing these tasks show significant increases in frontal regions during the Continuous Performance Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and the Tower of London, but not the Porteus Mazes. Activation produced by the Continuous Performance Test and the Tower of London are mesial and bilateral and may reflect stimulation of midline attentional circuits. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test produces a left dorsolateral area of prefrontal activation. These findings indicate that regional activation of the frontal lobes occurs in response to cognitive challenges produced through performance of standard neuropsychological tests.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While the CPT taps into sustained attention, a domain of executive function dependent on an intact prefrontal cortex, there was a ceiling effect; the task may not have been sufficiently challenging for this educated sample to demonstrate greater improvement with LDX versus placebo.
“While the CPT taps into sustained attention, a domain of executive function dependent on an intact prefrontal cortex [30], there was a ceiling effect; the task may not have been sufficiently challenging for this educated sample to demonstrate greater improvement with LDX versus placebo.”
From Treating new-onset cognitive complaints after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: A randomized controlled crossover trial of lisdexamfetamine (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Rezai, K., Andreasen, N. C., Alliger, R., Cohen, G., Swayze, V., & O'Leary, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-06-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 636-642
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039991528
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 40856, MH-31593, MHCRC-43271, R01MH040856)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex, regional cerebral blood flow, neuropsychological assessment, continuous performance test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Tower of London, Porteus Maze, attention, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cognitive activation, xenon inhalation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Regional Blood Flow, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review