Cited by 247Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The Neuropsychology of the Prefrontal Cortex

Rezai, K., Andreasen, N. C., Alliger, R., Cohen, G., Swayze, V., O'Leary, D. S.·1993·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Single photon emission computed tomography with the xenon inhalation technique is used to compare activation of regional cerebral blood flow in frontal brain regions during the performance of four widely used neuropsychological tests: the Continuous Performance Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Tower of London, and Porteus Mazes. Healthy normal volunteers performing these tasks show significant increases in frontal regions during the Continuous Performance Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and the Tower of London, but not the Porteus Mazes. Activation produced by the Continuous Performance Test and the Tower of London are mesial and bilateral and may reflect stimulation of midline attentional circuits. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test produces a left dorsolateral area of prefrontal activation. These findings indicate that regional activation of the frontal lobes occurs in response to cognitive challenges produced through performance of standard neuropsychological tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540060066020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While the CPT taps into sustained attention, a domain of executive function dependent on an intact prefrontal cortex, there was a ceiling effect; the task may not have been sufficiently challenging for this educated sample to demonstrate greater improvement with LDX versus placebo.

    “While the CPT taps into sustained attention, a domain of executive function dependent on an intact prefrontal cortex [30], there was a ceiling effect; the task may not have been sufficiently challenging for this educated sample to demonstrate greater improvement with LDX versus placebo.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 247

Authors
Rezai, K., Andreasen, N. C., Alliger, R., Cohen, G., Swayze, V., & O'Leary, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1993-06-01
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
636-642
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039991528
Cited by
247
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 40856, MH-31593, MHCRC-43271, R01MH040856)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, regional cerebral blood flow, neuropsychological assessment, continuous performance test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Tower of London, Porteus Maze, attention, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cognitive activation, xenon inhalation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Regional Blood Flow, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review