The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Specific Clinical Features Differentiate Multiple System Atrophy (Striatonigral Variety) From Parkinson's Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical recognition of multiple system atrophy (MSA) in patients presenting with parkinsonian signs is difficult. We attempted to verify the predictive value of some pointers that are used in clinical practice. DESIGN: Sixteen consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed MSA who presented with a parkinsonian syndrome over an 8-year period were studied retrospectively, and their clinical features were analyzed in detail. SETTING: Parkinson's Disease Society, Brain Tissue Bank, Institute of Neurology, London, England. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with pathologically proven MSA who presented with parkinsonian syndrome in the first 3 years since disease onset. METHODS: Clinical features that were analyzed included the rapidity of disease progression, the relative symmetry of symptom onset, the presence or absence of tremor at initial presentation, the therapeutic response to levodopa and the associated presence of autonomic dysfunction. Fourteen of the 16 patients also had a computed tomographic scan of the brain performed. The frequency of selected items in MSA was compared with that found in 20 pathologically confirmed cases of Parkinson's disease and 16 pathologically confirmed cases of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease). RESULTS: It was found that a probability scale based on five selected items discriminated MSA with a pure parkinsonian presentation from Parkinson's disease, but not from progressive supranuclear palsy. Patients affected by the latter disorder, however, commonly presented with additional clinical features (supranuclear vertical down-gaze palsy, axial dystonia, and cognitive impairment), which helped to differentiate it from MSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hughes, A. J., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Daniel, S. E., & Lees, A. J. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.6.1142 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson Disease
Gelb, D. J., Oliver, E., & Gilman, S. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.1.33 · Cited by 2,822
Litvan, I., Agid, Y., Calne, D., Campbell, G., Dubois, B., Duvoisin, R. C., Goetz, C. G., Golbe, L. I., Grafman, J., Growdon, J. H., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.1.1 · Cited by 2,538
The accuracy of diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service
Hughes, A. J., Daniel, S. E., Ben‐Shlomo, Y., & Lees, A. J. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf080 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationThe diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease
Tolosa, E., Wenning, G., & Poewe, W. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70285-4 · Cited by 902
Multiple system atrophy: A review of 203 pathologically proven cases
Wenning, G. K., Tison, F., ben Shlomo, Y., Daniel, S. E., & Quinn, N. P. (1997) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.870120203 · Cited by 803
Metadata
- Authors
- Colosimo, C., Albanese, A., Hughes, A. J., de Bruin, V. M. S., & Lees, A. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-298
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038193785
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Specific Clinical Features Differentiate Multiple System Atrophy (Striatonigral Variety) From Parkinson's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540270090024
- The paper
- Colosimo, C., Albanese, A., Hughes, A. J., de Bruin, V. M. S., & Lees, A. J. (1995). Some Specific Clinical Features Differentiate Multiple System Atrophy (Striatonigral Variety) From Parkinson's Disease. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540270090024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.