The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vigabatrin vs Carbamazepine Monotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: A Randomized, Controlled Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cognitive effects of initial vigabatrin monotherapy compared with initial carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. DESIGN: Open, randomized, controlled design. Follow-up period of 12 months. SETTING: University hospital with an epilepsy center. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients, aged 15 to 64 years, classified as suffering from partial seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy. Fifty-nine patients with a single epileptic seizure and no antiepileptic drug treatment served as a control population for objective safety measures. OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and toxicity of vigabatrin and carbamazepine, the drug success rate (ie, the proportion of patients continuing successful treatment with the randomly assigned drug) after 12 months of steady-state treatment was used. To evaluate the safety of the drugs in addition to reported side effects, visual evoked potential recordings and neuropsychological evaluation were performed during follow-up. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up period, 60% of patients receiving vigabatrin and carbamazepine were treated successfully. Vigabatrin caused fewer side effects that required discontinuation of therapy. However, vigabatrin had to be discontinuated more often owing to lack of efficacy, and fewer of the successfully treated patients receiving vigabatrin achieved total freedom from seizures. Vigabatrin had no detrimental effects on cognitive functions. Retrieval from both episodic and semantic memory and flexibility of mental processing improved significantly in patients successfully treated with vigabatrin. CONCLUSION: Vigabatrin seems to be an effective and safe antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy with fewer cognitive side effects than carbamazepine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Cited by
Marson, A. G., Al-Kharusi, A. M., Alwaidh, M., Appleton, R., Baker, G. A., Chadwick, D. W., Cramp, C., Cockerell, O. C., Cooper, P. N., Doughty, J., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60460-7 · Cited by 976
Metadata
- Authors
- Kälviäinen, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-10-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 989
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965450907
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vigabatrin vs Carbamazepine Monotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: A Randomized, Controlled Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340081016
- The paper
- Kälviäinen, R. (1995). Vigabatrin vs Carbamazepine Monotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: A Randomized, Controlled Study. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340081016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.